Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:52:51 -0500] rev 14670
scmutil: match now accepts a context or a repo
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:52:51 -0500] rev 14669
context: add a match builder method
This is groundwork for matching against filesets in contexts
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@softwareexpress.com.br> [Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:24:54 -0300] rev 14668
help/hgignore: refer to the builtin help instead of external URLs
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:08:54 +0200] rev 14667
sslutil: make messages for Python without certificate handling more helpful
We now explain why there is no certificate to verify and do not give hints
about cacerts when they can't be used anyway.
Nicolas Bareil <nico@chdir.org> [Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:03:03 +0200] rev 14666
sslutil: fall back to commonName when no dNSName in subjectAltName (issue2798)
Any entries in subjectAltName would prevent fallback to using commonName, but
RFC 2818 says:
If a subjectAltName extension of type dNSName is present, that MUST
be used as the identity. Otherwise, the (most specific) Common Name
field in the Subject field of the certificate MUST be used.
We now only consider dNSNames in subjectAltName.
(dNSName is known as 'DNS' in OpenSSL/Python.)
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:43:50 -0500] rev 14665
merge with i18n
Augie Fackler <durin42@gmail.com> [Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:22:50 -0500] rev 14664
svn subrepos: work around checkout obstructions (issue2752)
We do this by ensuring the working copy is clean and then blowing away
the working copy and replacing it with one from the desired path. We
could probably use 'svn switch' to do this more efficiently, but
there's some subtle logic required to get that right and this is
more likely to work reliably.
Augie Fackler <durin42@gmail.com> [Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:21:02 -0500] rev 14663
update: check wc.dirty() before setting overwrite=True
merge.update() was missing a few dirtiness checks from workingcontext,
including subrepo cleanliness checks. Using wc.dirty() instead of
one-off checks for various forms of dirtiness will be significantly
safer.