FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:55:35 +0900] rev 24472
cmdutil: allow bailifchanged to ignore merging in progress
In "commands.update()", "cmdutil.bailifchanged()" isn't used for
"abort if the working directory is dirty", because it forcibly
examines about merging in progress.
"workingctx.dirty()" used in "commands.update()" can't detect changes
of largefiles in the working directory without "repo.lfstatus = True"
wrapping. This is only reason of "commands.update()" wrapping by
largefiles extension.
On the other hand, "cmdutil.bailifchanged()" already wrapped by
largefiles extension can detect changes of largefiles.
This patch is a preparations for replacing "workingctx.dirty()" and
raising Abort in "commands.update()" by "cmdutil.bailifchanged()". It
can remove redundant "commands.update()" wrapping.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:55:35 +0900] rev 24471
subrepo: add bailifchanged to centralize raising Abort if subrepo is dirty
This patch also centralizes composing dirty reason message like
"uncommitted changes in subrepository 'xxxx'".
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:55:32 +0900] rev 24470
subrepo: add dirtyreason to centralize composing dirty reason message
This patch newly adds "dirtyreason()" to centralize composing dirty
reason message like "uncommitted changes in subrepository 'xxxx'".
There are 3 similar messages below, and this patch is a part of
preparations for unifying them into (1), too.
1. uncommitted changes in subrepository 'XXXX'
2. uncommitted changes in subrepository XXXX
3. uncommitted changes in subrepo XXXX
This patch chooses adding new method "dirtyreason()" instead of making
"dirty()" return "reason string", because:
- some of existing "dirty()" implementation is too complicated to do
so simply, and
- ill-mannered 3rd party subrepo classes, of which "dirty()" doesn't
return "reason string", cause meaningless message (even though it
is rare case)
Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:40:37 -0700] rev 24469
record_curses: add test for newly added files
We have a UI bug where toggling a newly added file twice in the curses
interface didn't mark it as selected. This test checks that the underlying
logic is working as expected, the next patch of the series fixes the UI bug.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:18:48 -0700] rev 24468
test-manifest.py: don't test .text() with present node suffix
When m.text() is called after setting a nodeid with a suffix (such as
'+'), manifestdict uses the suffix-less nodeid for the text, while
treemanifest includes the suffix. It would perhaps make most sense to
raise an exception so the bug is found, but since the two
implementations behave differently, let's just not test the behavior
for now.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:42:21 -0700] rev 24467
treemanifest: drop 22nd byte for consistency with manifestdict
When assigning a 22-byte hash to a nodeid in a manifest, manifestdict
drops the 22nd byte, while treemanifest keeps it. Let's make
treemanifest drop the 22nd byte as well.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:13:46 -0700] rev 24466
test-manifest.py: rewrite tests in terms of manifestdict
By rewriting test-manifest.py in terms of manifestdict instead of
_lazymanifest, the tests can be run on treemanifests too. There are
still a few tests that fail on treemanifests. They will be addressed
in the next few patches.