rust-regex: prevent nonsensical `.*.*` pattern from happening Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8507

rust-regex: fix issues with regex anchoring and performance It turns out that the way I tried to work around `regex`'s behavior difference with `re2` and Python's `re` was 1) buggy and 2) much more complicated than needed. In a few words: `regex` adds `.*` on either side of patterns when no start or end anchor is present. My previous workaround put `^` or `$` for every pattern, which is wrong even without the other 2 bugs on top of it. Using `^(?:<patterns>)` right at the end of the `regex` path fixes the issue. I've opened an issue to get a build option instead: https://github.com/rust-lang/regex/issues/675 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8506

diff: avoid going from contexts to nodes and back This will allow us to pass in-memory contexts that may not have a valid node to the diffing logic. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8503

cleanup: avoid extra node/ctx conversions in logcmdutil.diffordiffstat I'm about to write some code that wants to pass a memctx to diffordiffstat, but this feels like a meritorious cleanup anyway, since the first thing this method does is turn nodes into contexts, and most callers have a context handy. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8502

pyoxidizer: formatting bazel definitions This meets the Bazel style guide: https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/skylark/bzl-style.html and was mostly done automatically with buildifier. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8521

revisions: parse "x123" as "nodeid starting with 123" without prefixhexnode `experimental.revisions.prefixhexnode` makes it so the template function `shortest()` uses an "x" prefix to disambiguate between short nodeids and revnums. That config has so far also been used for enabling parsing of "x123" unambiguously as a nodeid. That makes it a little annoying for people who have prefixhexnode=yes to share such nodeids with people who have prefixhexnode=no ("x123" will be considered invalid for them). There seems to be little harm in allowing that parsing for everyone. We still let e.g. bookmark names like "x123" take precedence over the nodeid, so that's not a concern. The only thing I can think of is that people get used to the "x" prefix being valid, making it impossible for us to change to a different prefix if we wanted to do that when graduating the feature. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8514