Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:25:35 +0100 phases: large rework of advance boundary
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:25:35 +0100] rev 51421
phases: large rework of advance boundary In a similar spirit as the rework of retractboundary, the new algorithm is doing an amount of work in the order of magnitude of the amount of changeset that changes phases. (except to find new roots in impacted higher phases if any may exists). This result in a very significant speedup for repository with many old draft like mozilla try. runtime of perf:unbundle for a bundle constaining a single changeset (C code): before 6.7 phase work: 14.497 seconds before this change: 6.311 seconds (-55%) with this change: 2.240 seconds (-85%) Combined with the other patches that fixes the phases computation in the Rust index, the rust code with a persistent nodemap get back to quite interresting performances with 2.026 seconds for the same operation, about 10% faster than the C code.
Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:21:14 +0100 phases: apply similar early filtering to advanceboundary
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:21:14 +0100] rev 51420
phases: apply similar early filtering to advanceboundary advanceboundary is called the push's unbundle (but not the other unbundle) so advanceboundary did not show up the profile I looked at so far. We start with simple pre-filtering to avoid doing any work if we don't needs too.
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:09:25 +0100 phases: filter revision that are already in the right phase
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:09:25 +0100] rev 51419
phases: filter revision that are already in the right phase No need to compute new roots if everything is already in order.
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:05:29 +0100 phases: invalidate the phases set less often on retract boundary
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:05:29 +0100] rev 51418
phases: invalidate the phases set less often on retract boundary We already have the information to update the phase set, so we do so directly instead of invalidating the cache. This show a sizeable speedup in our `perf::unbundle` benchmark on the many-draft mozilla-try repository. ### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2023-03-22-zstd-sparse-revlog # benchmark.name = hg.perf.perf-unbundle # bin-env-vars.hg.flavor = no-rust # bin-env-vars.hg.py-re2-module = default # benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled # benchmark.variants.revs = last-10 before: 2.055259 seconds after: 1.887064 seconds (-8.18%) # benchmark.variants.revs = last-100 before: 2.409239 seconds after: 2.222429 seconds (-7.75%) # benchmark.variants.revs = last-1000 before: 3.945648 seconds after: 3.762480 seconds (-4.64%)
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:05:23 +0100 phases: incrementally update the phase sets when reasonable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:05:23 +0100] rev 51417
phases: incrementally update the phase sets when reasonable When the amount of manual walking is small, we update the phases set manually instead of computing them from scratch. This should help small update. The next changesets will make this used more often by reducing the amount of full invalidation we do on roots upgrade. The criteria for using an incremental upgrade are arbitrary, however, it "should never hurt".
Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:01:33 +0100 phasees: properly shallow caopy the phase sets dictionary
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:01:33 +0100] rev 51416
phasees: properly shallow caopy the phase sets dictionary We are about to increments the set more incrementally in some case, so we need to make a proper shallow copy of it.
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:42:13 +0100 phases: pass an unfiltered repository to _ensure_phase_sets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:42:13 +0100] rev 51415
phases: pass an unfiltered repository to _ensure_phase_sets It seems better for such a low level function to be able to assume it operate on a real repository.
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:01:25 +0100 phases: drop set building in `hasnonpublicphases`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:01:25 +0100] rev 51414
phases: drop set building in `hasnonpublicphases` We don't actually use the set, so why do we ensure they are built? (we should also clean up the use of repository argument but that's a quest for later).
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:59:28 +0100 phases: gather the logic for phasesets update in a single method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:59:28 +0100] rev 51413
phases: gather the logic for phasesets update in a single method This logic is duplicated around for no good reason, we gather it in a single place. The conditional is the new function are a bit weird as we about going to extend it soon.
Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:58:54 +0100 phases: change the way we warm the phasecache in repocache
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:58:54 +0100] rev 51412
phases: change the way we warm the phasecache in repocache Same logic as for the previous chngeset. We are about to rename and change the method used here.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 tip