Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:24:14 +0900 chgserver: do not send system() back to client if stdio redirected (issue5992) stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:24:14 +0900] rev 38801
chgserver: do not send system() back to client if stdio redirected (issue5992) As the chg client doesn't know server-side stdio redirection, the server shouldn't upcall on "runsystem" request if the stdio streams are redirected. This patch teaches ui to remember the redirection flag, which is updated by the caller right now. Future patches (for default) will add ui methods to manage this flag internally.
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:21:05 +0900 chgserver: update comment describing when to fall back to core _runsystem() stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:21:05 +0900] rev 38800
chgserver: update comment describing when to fall back to core _runsystem() The condition "output needs to be captured" was moved to the core ui, and removed at fbce78c58f1e "chg: refactor ui.system() to be partly overridden." The next patch will add one more "if" to address the issue 5992.
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:53:59 +0900 procutil: compare fd number to see if stdio protection is needed (issue5992) stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:53:59 +0900] rev 38799
procutil: compare fd number to see if stdio protection is needed (issue5992) When I wrote this function for commandserver at 69f86b937035, testing object identity was suffice, and I was sloppy enough not to compare fileno() values. However, it doesn't work in chg session because chgserver reopens stdio to apply new buffering mode. This patch partially fixes the issue 5992. Still we have another problem in chgui._runsystem().
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:06:02 +0900 test-ssh: show that stdio redirection doesn't work with chg stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:06:02 +0900] rev 38798
test-ssh: show that stdio redirection doesn't work with chg Running tests with --chg doesn't mean all hg invocations are replaced by chg. This patch explicitly adds the test for "chg serve --stdio", which does weird stdio dance.
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:32:38 -0400 revset: make heads(commonancestors(x + x^)) be x^, not x stable
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:32:38 -0400] rev 38797
revset: make heads(commonancestors(x + x^)) be x^, not x Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4742
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:29:39 -0400 revset: add tests of heads(commonancestors(..)) stable
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:29:39 -0400] rev 38796
revset: add tests of heads(commonancestors(..)) The second-to-last one shows the same bug as commonancestors(..): the result should be 8, not 9. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4741
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:18:43 -0400 revset: reword commonancestor()'s help stable
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:18:43 -0400] rev 38795
revset: reword commonancestor()'s help The new version seems a bit more consistent with other doc comments, and feels clearer to me (doesn't explain "commonancestors(set)" as "common ancestors of set"). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4740
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:14:57 -0400 revset: remove part of the commonancestors() comment stable
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:14:57 -0400] rev 38794
revset: remove part of the commonancestors() comment The reason is that: - it shows up in "hg help revset", but it doesn't look like documentation targeted at users - it doesn't make sense to me: it doesn't say what happens with < 2 revisions, and is not quite right because my understanding is that this revset was created precisely because "::x and ::y" was not quite the same (when x and y don't evaluate to singletons). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4739
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:05:21 -0400 revset: make commonancestors(x + x^) be ::(x^), not ::x stable
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:05:21 -0400] rev 38793
revset: make commonancestors(x + x^) be ::(x^), not ::x Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4738
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:27:41 -0400 revset: add test demonstrating a bug with commonancestor() stable
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:27:41 -0400] rev 38792
revset: add test demonstrating a bug with commonancestor() Specifically, 9 is clearly not in "::8 and ::9". Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4737
Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:03:14 -0400 revset: fix commonancestor test so it demonstrates correct behavior stable
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:03:14 -0400] rev 38791
revset: fix commonancestor test so it demonstrates correct behavior The problem is that hg log -r 'head()' is every changeset in the repository, because in this test repository, every changeset has a different branch. The author probably assumed all commits were on the default branch, and that they were getting topological heads, 7 and 9. As a result, this test was showing that the common ancestors of 0:9 are 0+1+2+4, which is not correct (next commit will test this). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4736
Tue, 11 Sep 2018 13:52:17 -0400 subrepo: mask out passwords embedded in the messages displaying a URL stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 11 Sep 2018 13:52:17 -0400] rev 38790
subrepo: mask out passwords embedded in the messages displaying a URL I noticed the password in maintenance logs for the "no changes since last push" and "pushing to" messages when pushing with an explicit path. But the test case here with :pushurl was also affected. I didn't see that cloning or pulling subrepos on demand had this problem, but it seems safer to just mask that too. There's a bit of a disconnect here, because it looks like clone is slicing off the password (makes sense not to store it in the hgrc in cleartext). But not shearing it off of an explicit path causes the subrepo not to realize that it already pushed the latest stuff. This is the easiest fix, however.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -12 +12 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip