Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:50:00 -0700 tests: fix rebase test broken by earlier cleanup
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:50:00 -0700] rev 44567
tests: fix rebase test broken by earlier cleanup It turns out I broke one of the rebase tests in dd2833e4d660 (tests: use drawdag in test-rebase-collapse.t, 2018-03-18) and didn't notice until now. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8277
Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:57:38 -0700 rebase: accept multiple --base arguments (BC)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:57:38 -0700] rev 44566
rebase: accept multiple --base arguments (BC) Same reasoning as for the previous patch. Rebase has worked well with `--base 'A + B'` since 51e7c83e05ee (rebase: calculate ancestors for --base separately (issue5420), 2016-11-28). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8293
Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:39:32 -0700 rebase: accept multiple --source arguments (BC)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:39:32 -0700] rev 44565
rebase: accept multiple --source arguments (BC) I think it's a little surprising that `hg rebase -s A -s B` rebases only `B::` and ignores `A`. That's because the `-s` flag is not a repeated flag. This patch makes it a repeated flag. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8292
Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:29:02 -0700 rebase: mention -r argument in synopsis
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 19:29:02 -0700] rev 44564
rebase: mention -r argument in synopsis I'm guessing that we simply forgot to mention it there. I was wondering if maybe `-r` was experimental as long as evolution is, but that doesn't seem to be the case (`-r` is not marked experimental). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8295
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip