Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900 cmdutil: enhance "getcommiteditor()" for specific usages in MQ
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21419
cmdutil: enhance "getcommiteditor()" for specific usages in MQ This patch introduces "finishdesc" and "extramsg" arguments into "getcommiteditor()" for specific usages in MQ. "finishdesc" will be used to treat the commit message as "[mq]; patch-file-name" (default MQ commit message), if it is left as empty, instead of aborting commit process. "extramsg" will be used to show the line below: HG: Leave message empty to use default message instead of: HG: Leave message empty to abort commit
Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900 tag: use the editor gotten by "getcommiteditor()" instead of "ui.edit()"
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21418
tag: use the editor gotten by "getcommiteditor()" instead of "ui.edit()" This patch also enhances "test-tag.t", because "hg tag" hasn't been explicitly tested around editor invocation and "--edit" option.
Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900 import: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21417
import: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice This patch also enhances "test-import-bypass.t" and "test-import.t", because "hg import" hasn't been explicitly tested around editor invocation and "--edit" option. This patch explicitly tests below: - with "--bypass" (regardless of "--edit"): - not invoked, if the patch contains the commit message - not invoked, if the commit message is explicitly specified - invoked, otherwise (just adding comment) - without "--bypass": - with "--edit": - not invoked, if "--no-commit" is not specified - invoked, otherwise - without "--edit": - not invoked, if the patch contains the commit message - not invoked, if "--message" or "--logfile" is specified (just adding comment) - invoked, otherwise
Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900 graft: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21416
graft: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice This patch also enhances "test-graft.t", because "hg graft" hasn't been explicitly tested around editor invocation and "--edit" option.
Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900 amend: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21415
amend: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice This patch doesn't change any tests like as preceding patches, because editor invocation is already tested in "test-commit-amend.t".
Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900 commit: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21414
commit: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice This patch also eliminates "forceeditor" no more referred. This patch doesn't change any tests like as preceding patches, because editor invocation is already tested well.
Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900 backout: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21413
backout: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice This patch also enhances "test-backout.t", because "hg backout" hasn't been explicitly tested around editor invocation and '--edit' option.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip