Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:53:17 +0100 branchcache: stop writing more branchcache file on disk than needed
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:53:17 +0100] rev 51553
branchcache: stop writing more branchcache file on disk than needed Before this change, we were unconditionally writing a branchmap file for the filter level passed to `update_disk`. This is actually counter productive if no update were needed for this filter level. In many case, the branch cache for a filter level is identical to its parent "subset" and it is better to simply keep the subset update and reuse it every time instead of having to do identical work for similar subset. So we change the `update_disk` method to only write a file when that filter level differ from its parent. This removes many cases where identical files were written, requiring multiple boring update in the test suite. The only notable changes is the change to `test-strip-branch-cache.t`, this case was checking a scenario that no longer reproduce the bug as writing less branchmap file result in less stalled cache on disk. Strictly speaking, we could create a more convoluted scenario that create a similar issue. However the next changeset would also cover that scenario so we directly updated that test case to a "no longer buggy" state.
Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:49:06 +0100 branchcache: do not copy the `_dirty` flag
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:49:06 +0100] rev 51552
branchcache: do not copy the `_dirty` flag If the inherited branch cache is dirty, it will be written on disk, and the super-set did not need to modify it, the on disk value for the subset will be re-useable as is. So the super set does not needs to write the very same content itself.
Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:52:08 +0100 branchcache: explicitly assert that copy is always about inheritance
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:52:08 +0100] rev 51551
branchcache: explicitly assert that copy is always about inheritance This would catch cases where copy is used for something else if any existed.
Sat, 09 Mar 2024 02:07:15 +0100 branchcache: stop using `copy(…)` in `replace(…)`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 09 Mar 2024 02:07:15 +0100] rev 51550
branchcache: stop using `copy(…)` in `replace(…)` The `copy` method is mostly used for a filter level to inherit the branchmap from a subset. So we stop using (abusing) it in "replace" to ensure `copy` is used only for inheritance purposes. Since `replace` is a method of the BranchMapCache, it seems fine to do lower level operation there.
Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:47:32 +0100 branchcache: change the _delayed flag to an explicit `_dirty` flag
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:47:32 +0100] rev 51549
branchcache: change the _delayed flag to an explicit `_dirty` flag This is more consistent with the logic we use for other object and it open the way to a clearer management of the cache state. Now, cache are created clean, cache update mark them dirty, writing them on disk mark them clean again.
Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:50:15 +0100 branchcache: write branchmap in subset inheritance order
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:50:15 +0100] rev 51548
branchcache: write branchmap in subset inheritance order This way, we can guarantee a valid subset has been written before touching the branchmap of another filter. This is especially useful as we are bout to start deleting outdated branchmap file.
Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:06:54 +0100 branchcache: do not accept "empty update"
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:06:54 +0100] rev 51547
branchcache: do not accept "empty update" This currently does not happens and it will be simpler that is remains that way. If all update do something, we will be able to simply declare, in a later changesets, that all update to result in a dirty branchcache.
Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:04:34 +0100 branchcache: avoid created a `None` filter repoview when writing
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:04:34 +0100] rev 51546
branchcache: avoid created a `None` filter repoview when writing The repoview class is not intended to be used for unfiltered repository.
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:49:55 +0100 stream-clone-tests: stop filtering non existent warning
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:49:55 +0100] rev 51545
stream-clone-tests: stop filtering non existent warning This filtering was introduced in 74c004a515bc, however there is already no warning in that changeset. So I guess the warnings existed when we the patch was created but the problem was solved in another changeset that 74c004a515bc, rebased on.
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:46:12 +0100 stream-clone-test: simplify case testing obsolescence
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:46:12 +0100] rev 51544
stream-clone-test: simplify case testing obsolescence There is only two important things in this test: - the number of file we send, to show we picked the obsstore. - the resulting state, to show we did alter things in the process. The rest are of the number are very fragile and consume a lot of time for little value when adjusting formats, caches, and protocol.
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:43:07 +0100 stream-clone-test: simplify the case testing phases
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:43:07 +0100] rev 51543
stream-clone-test: simplify the case testing phases There is only two important things in this test: - the number of file we send, to show we picked the phase roots. - the resulting phases, to show we did not modified them. The rest are of the number are very fragile and consume a lot of time for little value when adjusting formats, caches, and protocol.
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:39:10 +0100 stream-clone-test: simplify bookmark clone
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:39:10 +0100] rev 51542
stream-clone-test: simplify bookmark clone The important things to test here is the number of file included (to catch that the bookmark file was sent). So we keep that part non glob'ed but glob the rest. The glob'ed numbers are very fragile and consume a lot of time for little value when adjusting formats, caches, and protocol.
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:31:42 +0100 stream-clone-test: add a verify call to the "clone while changing" case
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:31:42 +0100] rev 51541
stream-clone-test: add a verify call to the "clone while changing" case It seems useful to very that the clone did not result in a corrupted copy.
Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:59:51 +0100 stream-clone-test: add title to various test cases
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:59:51 +0100] rev 51540
stream-clone-test: add title to various test cases These case are fine as is, but as we are adding title to all the other as we simplify them, lets add title for all cases.
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:28:07 +0100 stream-clone-test: simplify testing of secret cloning restriction
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:28:07 +0100] rev 51539
stream-clone-test: simplify testing of secret cloning restriction Here, we just want to check if the streaming clone is allowed and used or not. We do not care about the details of the clone itself.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 +300 tip