Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:53:17 +0100] rev 51553
branchcache: stop writing more branchcache file on disk than needed
Before this change, we were unconditionally writing a branchmap file for the
filter level passed to `update_disk`. This is actually counter productive if no
update were needed for this filter level. In many case, the branch cache for a
filter level is identical to its parent "subset" and it is better to simply
keep the subset update and reuse it every time instead of having to do identical
work for similar subset.
So we change the `update_disk` method to only write a file when that filter
level differ from its parent. This removes many cases where identical files were
written, requiring multiple boring update in the test suite.
The only notable changes is the change to `test-strip-branch-cache.t`, this
case was checking a scenario that no longer reproduce the bug as writing less
branchmap file result in less stalled cache on disk.
Strictly speaking, we could create a more convoluted scenario that create a
similar issue. However the next changeset would also cover that scenario so we
directly updated that test case to a "no longer buggy" state.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:49:06 +0100] rev 51552
branchcache: do not copy the `_dirty` flag
If the inherited branch cache is dirty, it will be written on disk, and the
super-set did not need to modify it, the on disk value for the subset will be
re-useable as is. So the super set does not needs to write the very same content
itself.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:52:08 +0100] rev 51551
branchcache: explicitly assert that copy is always about inheritance
This would catch cases where copy is used for something else if any existed.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 09 Mar 2024 02:07:15 +0100] rev 51550
branchcache: stop using `copy(…)` in `replace(…)`
The `copy` method is mostly used for a filter level to inherit the branchmap
from a subset. So we stop using (abusing) it in "replace" to ensure `copy` is
used only for inheritance purposes.
Since `replace` is a method of the BranchMapCache, it seems fine to do lower
level operation there.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:47:32 +0100] rev 51549
branchcache: change the _delayed flag to an explicit `_dirty` flag
This is more consistent with the logic we use for other object and it open the way to a clearer management of the cache state.
Now, cache are created clean, cache update mark them dirty, writing them on
disk mark them clean again.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:50:15 +0100] rev 51548
branchcache: write branchmap in subset inheritance order
This way, we can guarantee a valid subset has been written before touching the
branchmap of another filter.
This is especially useful as we are bout to start deleting outdated branchmap
file.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:06:54 +0100] rev 51547
branchcache: do not accept "empty update"
This currently does not happens and it will be simpler that is remains that way.
If all update do something, we will be able to simply declare, in a later
changesets, that all update to result in a dirty branchcache.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:04:34 +0100] rev 51546
branchcache: avoid created a `None` filter repoview when writing
The repoview class is not intended to be used for unfiltered repository.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:49:55 +0100] rev 51545
stream-clone-tests: stop filtering non existent warning
This filtering was introduced in 74c004a515bc, however there is already no
warning in that changeset. So I guess the warnings existed when we the patch
was created but the problem was solved in another changeset that 74c004a515bc,
rebased on.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:46:12 +0100] rev 51544
stream-clone-test: simplify case testing obsolescence
There is only two important things in this test:
- the number of file we send, to show we picked the obsstore.
- the resulting state, to show we did alter things in the process.
The rest are of the number are very fragile and consume a lot of time for little
value when adjusting formats, caches, and protocol.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:43:07 +0100] rev 51543
stream-clone-test: simplify the case testing phases
There is only two important things in this test:
- the number of file we send, to show we picked the phase roots.
- the resulting phases, to show we did not modified them.
The rest are of the number are very fragile and consume a lot of time for little
value when adjusting formats, caches, and protocol.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:39:10 +0100] rev 51542
stream-clone-test: simplify bookmark clone
The important things to test here is the number of file included (to catch that
the bookmark file was sent). So we keep that part non glob'ed but glob the
rest.
The glob'ed numbers are very fragile and consume a lot of time for little value
when adjusting formats, caches, and protocol.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:31:42 +0100] rev 51541
stream-clone-test: add a verify call to the "clone while changing" case
It seems useful to very that the clone did not result in a corrupted copy.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:59:51 +0100] rev 51540
stream-clone-test: add title to various test cases
These case are fine as is, but as we are adding title to all the other as we
simplify them, lets add title for all cases.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:28:07 +0100] rev 51539
stream-clone-test: simplify testing of secret cloning restriction
Here, we just want to check if the streaming clone is allowed and used or not.
We do not care about the details of the clone itself.