Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:41:21 -0400] rev 39165
tests: update test-check-py3-compat.t output in the py3exe branch
This hasn't been maintained in a while, it looks like.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4289
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Wed, 15 Aug 2018 17:40:21 -0700] rev 39164
overlayworkingctx: fix exception in metadata-only inmemory merges (issue5960)
If there was a metadata-only mutation, such as +x or -x on a file, we would
create a cache entry with None for data, and this would cause problems later on
when some code tried to run fctx.data() or similar, and was expecting a string.
My original fix for this involved passing data=self._wrappedctx[path].data() in
setflags(), but this version seems slightly better - this way, if we ever call
write() and then call setflags(), we don't destroy the data that we wrote that's
in the cache. I haven't verified that other fields aren't destroyed, such as
date or flags :)
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4287
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 14 Aug 2018 22:20:28 +0900] rev 39163
filemerge: show actual capabilities of internal merge tools
This information is useful to know which internal merge tools can be
applied safely on binary files and/or symlinks.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 15 Aug 2018 22:24:50 +0900] rev 39162
filemerge: add config knob to check capabilities of internal merge tools
For historical reason, Mercurial assumes capabilities of internal
merge tools as below while examining rules to decide merge tool,
regardless of actual capabilities of them.
=============== ====== ========
specified via binary symlinks
=============== ====== ========
--tool o o
HGMERGE o o
merge-patterns o (*) x (*)
ui.merge x (*) x (*)
=============== ====== ========
This causes:
- unintentional internal merge tool is chosen for binary files via
merge-patterns section of configuration file
- explicit configuration of internal merge tool for symlinks is
ignored unintentionally
But on the other hand, simple "check capability strictly" might break
backward compatibility (e.g. existing merge automations), because it
changes the result of merge tool selection.
Therefore, this patch adds config knob "merge.strict-capability-check"
to control whether capabilities of internal merge tools should be
checked strictly or not.
If this configuration is true, capabilities of internal merge tools
are checked strictly in (*) cases above.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 15 Aug 2018 22:24:38 +0900] rev 39161
filemerge: show warning if chosen tool has no binary files capability
While matching patterns in "merge-patterns" configuration, Mercurial
silently assumes that all merge tools have binary files
capability. This implementation comes from 5af5f0f9d724 (or Mercurial
1.0).
At failure of merging binary files with incorrect internal merge tool,
there is no hint about this silent ignorance of binary files
capability.
This patch shows warning message, if chosen internal merge tool has no
binary files capability. This will help users to investigate why a
binary file isn't merged as expected.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:15:51 +0900] rev 39160
filemerge: add the function to examine a capability of a internal tool
For "symlink" and "binary" capabilities, _toolbool() can not examine
these of internal merge tools strictly, because it examines only
configurations in "merge-tools" section.
Users can configure them explicitly as below for example, but this is
not ordinary usage and not convenient:
[merge-tools]
:other.symlink = true
:other.binary = true
This patch adds hascapability() internal function, which can examine
actual capabilities of a internal merge tool strictly.
At this patch, hascapability() is still used with "strict=False".
Subsequent patches use it with "strict=True".
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:08:27 +0900] rev 39159
filemerge: set actual capabilities of internal merge tools
This information is used to detect actual capabilities of internal
merge tools by subsequent patches.
For convenience, this patch assumes that merge tools typed as
"nomerge" have both binary files and symlinks capabilities.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:05:36 +0900] rev 39158
help: describe more detail about capabilities while deciding merge tool
"hg help merge-tools" describes as below:
(internal merge tools) will by default not handle symlinks or
binary files.
But in some cases, Mercurial assumes that internal merge tools have
one or both of these capabilities.
"hg help merge-tools" also describes as below, for matching patterns in
merge-patterns configuration section. But this is not sufficient.
Here, binary capabilities of the merge tool are not considered.
This patch describes more detail about capabilities while deciding
merge tool.
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:50:53 -0400] rev 39157
tests: un-glob patchbomb test lines that were only globbing a hostname
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4296
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:42:04 -0400] rev 39156
tests: force a stable hostname in patchbomb tests
No visible output changes in this commit because everything is globbed
away, but on Python 3 the stable hostname will mean that the headers
don't trigger RFC2822 multi-line mode because they'll always be
consistently short.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4295