relnotes: copy contents of "next" to "5.8" and clear "next" The same procedure as every year^Wcycle. Unlike previous cycles, I haven't actually recorded the copy because we don't want to propagate further changes in "next" (from the stable branch) to "5.8". Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10500

dirstateguard: use mktemp-like functionality to generate the backup filenames Previously these were generated with names like: `dirstate.backup.commit.<memory address of dirstateguard>` This could cause problems if two hg commands ran at the same time that used the same memory address, (which is apparently not uncommon if chg is involved), as memory addresses are not unique across processes. This issue was reported in the post-review comments on http://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9952. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10504

repoview: separate concerns in _filteredrepotypes comment The cited issue in Python bugtracker is closed, but hasn't been fixed. We've been able to use the attached example and reproduce it with Python 3.9. The point where it turns from needless stress on the GC to the an actual leak is when one factors in the fact that the GC was before Python 3.4 unable to collect some types (see PEP 442). Note that even with Python 2.7, the simple example of cycles due to __mro__ are collectable. This was seen again with the example attached on the CPython issue.