Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:35:54 +0530 rebase: correct misleading message in --confirm option
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:35:54 +0530] rev 38675
rebase: correct misleading message in --confirm option Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3939
Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:23:51 +0530 rebase: make sure we don't loose the return code in --confirm option
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:23:51 +0530] rev 38674
rebase: make sure we don't loose the return code in --confirm option return _dorebase() to make sure it returns 'return code'. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3938
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:12:01 -0700 rebase: use revnums (not nodes) for set of extinct revisions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:12:01 -0700] rev 38673
rebase: use revnums (not nodes) for set of extinct revisions There is no need to convert extinct revisions to nodeids. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3942
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:01:47 -0700 rebase: avoid converting from nodes to revnums twice
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:01:47 -0700] rev 38672
rebase: avoid converting from nodes to revnums twice In the case where the node has successors, but none of them is an ancestor of the destination, we would iterate over the successor nodes twice, check if they're in the repo and convert them to revnums. I doubt it's a measureable cost, but it gets simpler this way too. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3941
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip