Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:42:23 -0400 contrib: open a hole in the open().read() ban for open().close()
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:42:23 -0400] rev 36955
contrib: open a hole in the open().read() ban for open().close() It turns out open().close() is both fine and something we occasionally do to verify something can be written. The few cases in the codebase were getting missed due to a regular expression bug (which I discussed in my previous change), but since I'm about to fix the bug, I need to fix the patterns. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2864
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -1 +1 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip