Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:26:15 +0200 flagprocessors: move _flagserrorclass attribute on revlog & co
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:26:15 +0200] rev 42996
flagprocessors: move _flagserrorclass attribute on revlog & co This is a small duplication, and the last bit we need to get rid of the mixin. Honestly, I am not fan of that class attribute and it mostly exist to accomodate The simple-storage whose usage of flag processors is dumbious and that is currently dead code anyway. However I don't want to be pulled into futher unrelated cleaning so it is a small price to pay. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6822
Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:22:38 +0200 flagprocessors: directly duplicate the deprecated layer back into revlog
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:22:38 +0200] rev 42995
flagprocessors: directly duplicate the deprecated layer back into revlog The code duplication benign and will get removed in a couple of month anyway. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6821
Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:16:32 +0200 flagprocessors: make `processflagsraw` a module level function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:16:32 +0200] rev 42994
flagprocessors: make `processflagsraw` a module level function One more steps toward removing the mixin. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6820
Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:11:58 +0200 flagprocessors: make `processflagsread` a module level function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:11:58 +0200] rev 42993
flagprocessors: make `processflagsread` a module level function One more steps toward removing the mixin. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6819
Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:50:32 +0200 flagprocessors: make `processflagswrite` a module level function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:50:32 +0200] rev 42992
flagprocessors: make `processflagswrite` a module level function One more step towards removing the mixin. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6818
Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:43:06 +0200 flagprocessors: make `_processflagsfunc` a module level function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:43:06 +0200] rev 42991
flagprocessors: make `_processflagsfunc` a module level function This is the first step toward removing the flag processing mixin. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6817
Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:53:27 +0200 flagprocessors: writetransform function take side data as parameter (API)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:53:27 +0200] rev 42990
flagprocessors: writetransform function take side data as parameter (API) If we want some flag processors to be able to store sidedata it needs to be actually fed that data. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6816
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:17 +0200 flagprocessors: add a `sidedata` parameters to _processflagswrite
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:17 +0200] rev 42989
flagprocessors: add a `sidedata` parameters to _processflagswrite To read sidedata using flagprocessors, we need flag processors to store them. So we pass this information to the flag processing layer. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6815
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:34 +0200 revlog: add a `sidedata` parameters to addrevision
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:34 +0200] rev 42988
revlog: add a `sidedata` parameters to addrevision If we want to eventually store sidedata we need to be able to pass them along. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6814
Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:34:03 +0200 flagprocessors: have the read transform function return side data (API)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:34:03 +0200] rev 42987
flagprocessors: have the read transform function return side data (API) This makes it possible for flag processors to -read- flag data. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6813
Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:13:45 +0200 flagprocessors: return flagdata in the main processing function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:13:45 +0200] rev 42986
flagprocessors: return flagdata in the main processing function This function input and return are becoming stranger and stranger bnut I don't have a good plan to make is saner without problematic code duplication, so it will be this way to now. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6812
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:55:04 +0200 flagprocessors: return sidedata map in `_processflagsread`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:55:04 +0200] rev 42985
flagprocessors: return sidedata map in `_processflagsread` Right now, flag processors does not return sidedata, by they will. So, we prepare the caller to receive it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6811
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:41 +0200 revlog: use the new sidedata map return in the sidedata method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:41 +0200] rev 42984
revlog: use the new sidedata map return in the sidedata method So far things, seems logical. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6810
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:54:04 +0200 revlog: return sidedata map from `_revisiondata`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:54:04 +0200] rev 42983
revlog: return sidedata map from `_revisiondata` Nothing extra any side data yet. However, it will happens in the future. So we better prepare the callers of the `_revisiondata` to deal with it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6809
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:27 +0200 revlog: introduce a `sidedata` method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:27 +0200] rev 42982
revlog: introduce a `sidedata` method The method give access to extra information related to the revision. Such data will not be part of the hash be strongly related to the revision. Having them stored at the revlog level helps the storage consistency story and simplify various things. Example of data we could store there: - copy tracing related informations - graph structure related information (useful for discovery) - unresolved conflict data The full implementation will be introduced gradually in the coming changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6808
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip