rebase: use scmutil.cleanupnodes (issue5606) (BC) This patch migrates rebase to use scmutil.cleanupnodes API. It simplifies the code and makes rebase code reusable inside a transaction. This is a BC because the backup file is no longer strip-backup/*-backup.hg, but strip-backup/*-rebase.hg. The latter looks more reasonable since the directory name is "strip-backup" so there is no need to repeat "backup". I think the backup file name change is probably fine as a BC, since we have changed it before (aa4a1672583e) and didn't get complains. The end result of this series will be a much more consistent and unified backup names: command | old backup file suffix | new backup file suffix ------------------------------------------------------------------- amend | amend-backup.hg | amend.hg histedit | backup.hg (could be 2 files) | histedit.hg (single file) rebase | backup.hg | rebase.hg strip | backup.hg | backup.hg (note: backup files are under .hg/strip-backup) It also fixes issue5606 as a side effect because the new "delayedstrip" code path will carefully examine nodes (safestriproots) to make sure orphaned changesets won't get stripped by accident. Some warning messages are changed to the new "warning: orphaned descendants detected, not stripping HASHES", which provides more information about exactly what changesets are left behind. Another minor behavior change is when there is an obsoleted changeset with a successor in the destination branch, bookmarks pointing to that obsoleted changeset will not be moved. I have commented in test-rebase-obsolete.t explaining why that is more desirable.

scmutil: make cleanupnodes delete divergent bookmarks cleanupnodes takes care of bookmark movement, and bookmark movement could cause bookmark divergent resolution as a side effect. This patch adds such bookmark divergent resolution logic so future rebase migration will be easier. The revset is carefully written to be equivalent to what rebase does today. Although I think it might make sense to remove divergent bookmarks more aggressively, for example: F book@1 | E book@2 | | D book | | | C |/ B book@3 | A When rebase -s C -d E, "book@1" will be removed, "book@3" will be kept, and the end result is: D book | C | F | E book@2 (?) | B book@3 | A The question is should we keep book@2? The current logic keeps it. If we choose not to (makes some sense to me), the "deleterevs" revset could be simplified to "newnode % oldnode". For now, I just make it compatible with the existing behavior. If we want to make the "deleterevs" revset simpler, we can always do it in the future.

scmutil: make cleanupnodes handle filtered node In some valid usecases, the "mapping" received by scmutil.cleanupnodes have filtered nodes. Use unfiltered repo to access them correctly. The added test case will fail with the old cleanupnodes code. This is important to migrate histedit to use the cleanupnodes API.