Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:22:47 +0100 branching: merge stable into default
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:22:47 +0100] rev 51371
branching: merge stable into default
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 22:51:01 +0100 delta-find: pass the full deltainfo to the _DeltaSearch class
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 22:51:01 +0100] rev 51370
delta-find: pass the full deltainfo to the _DeltaSearch class Having more information is better, so we pass it directly.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 05:20:00 +0100 delta-find: move sparse-revlog pre-filtering in the associated class
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 05:20:00 +0100] rev 51369
delta-find: move sparse-revlog pre-filtering in the associated class Lets move the specialized code in the specialized class.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 05:16:08 +0100 delta-find: move sparse-revlog delta checks in the associated class
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 05:16:08 +0100] rev 51368
delta-find: move sparse-revlog delta checks in the associated class Lets move the specialized code in the specialized class.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 04:39:18 +0100 delta-find: split the _DeltaSearch class in two
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 04:39:18 +0100] rev 51367
delta-find: split the _DeltaSearch class in two We now have things sliced small enough to have two class that use different `_iter_groups` implementation to encode their different logic. The filtering code remains to be moved, but I would rather keep this changeset simple and move them in the next.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 22:40:11 +0100 delta-find: finish reworking the snapshot logic and drop more layer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 22:40:11 +0100] rev 51366
delta-find: finish reworking the snapshot logic and drop more layer The refining logic only applies to the snapshot logic, and this is now all contained in a dedicated method. Along the way, we drop the refined_groups // raw_groups layer as they no longer make sense. The result is a more explicit `iter_groups` method. This conclude the splitting and simplification of the groups generation. We are now ready to dispatch this in more diverse classes.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 22:29:02 +0100 delta-find: move the base of the delta search in its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 22:29:02 +0100] rev 51365
delta-find: move the base of the delta search in its own function That logic is complicated enough that is is worth puting in its own function. Another method will be introduced in the next changeset to deal with the actual refining.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:44:51 +0100 delta-find: move the emotion of prev in a dedicated method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:44:51 +0100] rev 51364
delta-find: move the emotion of prev in a dedicated method After splitting the filtering, and with the `_candidate_groups` layer removed, we can start splitting the group generation too. This helps to organize this code and make it easier to modifying the future.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:51:43 +0100 delta-find: move the emotion of parents in a dedicated method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:51:43 +0100] rev 51363
delta-find: move the emotion of parents in a dedicated method After splitting the filtering, and with the `_candidate_groups` layer removed, we can start splitting the group generation too. This helps to organize this code and make it easier to modifying the future.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:08:46 +0100 delta-find: explicitly deal with usage of the cached revision
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:08:46 +0100] rev 51362
delta-find: explicitly deal with usage of the cached revision We can remove this from the general logic path and directly deal with this corner case early. This result in a small change in test-generaldelta.t as it turns out that: - at commit time we (sometimes) precompute a delta against p1 and pass it as the cached delta. - since cached delta where going through the same filtering as everything, we could "optimize" the base if it applied to an empty delta, resulting in not using the pre-computed delta. The simpler logic fix the second item, making the cached delta base always actually tested when requested. Note that the computation of a fast delta against p1 only is questionable, but looking into that is out of scope for this series.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:02:30 +0100 delta-find: remove the "candidate groups" layer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:02:30 +0100] rev 51361
delta-find: remove the "candidate groups" layer We have enough pieces to remove this generator and directly bear it load using the underlying object.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:13:36 +0100 delta-find: stop using heuristic to determine if we are creating a snapshot
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:13:36 +0100] rev 51360
delta-find: stop using heuristic to determine if we are creating a snapshot This avoid assuming a changeset is a snapshot when it is actually something simpler.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 02:38:38 +0100 delta-find: explicitly track stage of the search
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 02:38:38 +0100] rev 51359
delta-find: explicitly track stage of the search Being more explicit about what we are doing is going to be useful. We actually start making use of it in later changesets.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 20:09:34 +0100 delta-find: drop some dead debug code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 20:09:34 +0100] rev 51358
delta-find: drop some dead debug code Seems like it was never put to use, so lets simply remove it for now.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:34:27 +0100 delta-find: introduce and use specialized _DeltaSearch class
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:34:27 +0100] rev 51357
delta-find: introduce and use specialized _DeltaSearch class For now, we introduce some very simple variant, but they are still useful to display how having the class can helps keeping the simple case simple and their special case out of more advanced logic.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 01:05:10 +0100 delta-find: introduce a base class for _DeltaSearch
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 01:05:10 +0100] rev 51356
delta-find: introduce a base class for _DeltaSearch This prepare the introduction of specialized the class in the next changesets.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:23:24 +0100 delta-find: simplify the delta checking function for snapshot
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 03:23:24 +0100] rev 51355
delta-find: simplify the delta checking function for snapshot Since the function is all about snapshot, we can safely use an early return and make the result simpler.
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 00:56:15 +0100 delta-find: move good delta code earlier in the class
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 07 Jan 2024 00:56:15 +0100] rev 51354
delta-find: move good delta code earlier in the class Nothing change except the code location. This greatly helps readability of the next future diff,
Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:20:30 +0100 delta-find: split is_good_delta_info into more thematic function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:20:30 +0100] rev 51353
delta-find: split is_good_delta_info into more thematic function Same logic as for candidate filtering, we group code into related sub method. This will help clarifying later patches as some logic is pre-splitted
Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:35:57 +0100 delta-find: clarify some comment and code in is_good_delta_info
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:35:57 +0100] rev 51352
delta-find: clarify some comment and code in is_good_delta_info We move the comment closer to the code it describ and we compute an intermediate value without using the `textlen` variable, as it will stop being defined in a future patch. This will clarify future patches.
Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:35:36 +0100 delta-find: move delta size check earlier in is_good_delta_info
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:35:36 +0100] rev 51351
delta-find: move delta size check earlier in is_good_delta_info This will clarify future patches by regrouping related logic before larger movement.
Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:04:10 +0100 delta-find: split the delta-chain part of `_pre_filter_rev` in a method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:04:10 +0100] rev 51350
delta-find: split the delta-chain part of `_pre_filter_rev` in a method Since `_pre_filter_rev` contains logic from various sources of constraint, we start splitting is in subfunction to clarify and document the grouping.
Thu, 04 Jan 2024 14:51:48 +0100 delta-find: split the "sparse" part of `_pre_filter_rev` in a method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Jan 2024 14:51:48 +0100] rev 51349
delta-find: split the "sparse" part of `_pre_filter_rev` in a method Since `_pre_filter_rev` contains logic from various sources of constraint, we start splitting is in subfunction to clarify and document the grouping.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:56:31 +0100 delta-find: split the generic part of `_pre_filter_rev` in a method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:56:31 +0100] rev 51348
delta-find: split the generic part of `_pre_filter_rev` in a method Since `_pre_filter_rev` contains logic from various sources of constraint, we start splitting is in subfunction to clarify and document the grouping.
Thu, 04 Jan 2024 14:39:10 +0100 delta-find: drop the temporary indent
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Jan 2024 14:39:10 +0100] rev 51347
delta-find: drop the temporary indent Now that the complicated change is made, we can do the noisy one.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:40:47 +0100 delta-find: move pre-filtering of individual revision in its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:40:47 +0100] rev 51346
delta-find: move pre-filtering of individual revision in its own function This goes one step further than the previous change by making the pre-filtering of individual candicates revision in its own function. This will allow subclass to easily configure this filtering with their own constrains. The `if True:` part help the readability of this diff a lot and will be drop in to the next changesets.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 04:21:07 +0100 delta-find: move pre-filtering of candidates in its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 04:21:07 +0100] rev 51345
delta-find: move pre-filtering of candidates in its own function This organise the code further and open the way to specialization via sub-classing. Something important for the coming changes.
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:35:08 +0100 delta-find: move away from the generator API for _DeltaSearch
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:35:08 +0100] rev 51344
delta-find: move away from the generator API for _DeltaSearch We use more explicit function call. This make operations more explicit and will make future refactoring simpler.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:13:14 +0100 delta-find: use "-1" as depth snapshot-dept for non snapshot in debug
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:13:14 +0100] rev 51343
delta-find: use "-1" as depth snapshot-dept for non snapshot in debug This will help do distinct full snapshot (level 0) and normal delta (not a snapshot, no snapshot level)
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:45:45 +0100 delta-find: fix the computation of the `prev` value
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:45:45 +0100] rev 51342
delta-find: fix the computation of the `prev` value The previous computation was "wrong" it always used the tiprev, even when computing a delta in a non-append case (mostly benchmark). This never produced wrong delta on disk, but would misled debug or performance command. Since it does not have any actual user impact, I did not put this on stable. With the code fixed we can now use revisions in some search and it makes the test display more interesting behavior since the algorithm has more to work with.
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 01:33:40 +0100 delta-find: move is_good_delta_info on the _DeltaSearch class
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 22 Dec 2023 01:33:40 +0100] rev 51341
delta-find: move is_good_delta_info on the _DeltaSearch class There is a lot of format specific code in `is_good_delta_info`, moving it on _DeltaSearch will allow to split this into subclass soon.
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 01:33:33 +0100 delta-find: feed revinfo to _DeltaSearch
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 22 Dec 2023 01:33:33 +0100] rev 51340
delta-find: feed revinfo to _DeltaSearch The revinfo has more information and will allow for even more function to be turned into method.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 03:23:11 +0100 delta-find: clarify that revisioninfo.p1/p2 constains nodeid
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 03:23:11 +0100] rev 51339
delta-find: clarify that revisioninfo.p1/p2 constains nodeid This clarify the content of these attributes.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 03:23:41 +0100 delta-find: move filing of some debug data in `_one_dbg_data`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 03:23:41 +0100] rev 51338
delta-find: move filing of some debug data in `_one_dbg_data` Since the `_one_dbg_data` method is meant to create a valid debug dictionnary. We can as well prefill the relevant value to reduce the amount of debug code in the main code.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 01:28:30 +0100 delta-find: add more explanation to the the deltas_limit < length check
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 01:28:30 +0100] rev 51337
delta-find: add more explanation to the the deltas_limit < length check More explanations is always good.
Thu, 23 Nov 2023 01:13:40 +0100 delta-find: move tested in the _DeltaSearch.__init__
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 23 Nov 2023 01:13:40 +0100] rev 51336
delta-find: move tested in the _DeltaSearch.__init__ Now that we have an object we can initialize that attribute at initialization time. This will make it available for more method in the future, allowing to split the code.
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:05:29 +0100 delta-find: check DELTA_BASE_REUSE_FORCE in the _DeltaSearch.__init__
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:05:29 +0100] rev 51335
delta-find: check DELTA_BASE_REUSE_FORCE in the _DeltaSearch.__init__ Now that we have an object we can check that DELTA_BASE_REUSE_FORCE cases does not reach this code at in a more suitable location.
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:04:23 +0100 delta-find: move target_rev in the _DeltaSearch.__init__
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:04:23 +0100] rev 51334
delta-find: move target_rev in the _DeltaSearch.__init__ Now that we have an object we can initialize that attribute at initialization time.
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:03:21 +0100 delta-find: move snapshot_cache in the _DeltaSearch.__init__
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:03:21 +0100] rev 51333
delta-find: move snapshot_cache in the _DeltaSearch.__init__ Now that we have an object we can initialize that attribute at initialization time.
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 04:59:25 +0100 delta-find: move `_rawgroups` on the `_DeltaSearch` object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 Nov 2023 04:59:25 +0100] rev 51332
delta-find: move `_rawgroups` on the `_DeltaSearch` object Moving more code before doing more logic changes.
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 04:53:11 +0100 delta-find: move `_refinedgroups` on the `_DeltaSearch` object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 Nov 2023 04:53:11 +0100] rev 51331
delta-find: move `_refinedgroups` on the `_DeltaSearch` object Moving more code before doing more logic changes.
Mon, 20 Nov 2023 04:44:40 +0100 delta-find: introduce a _DeltaSearch object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 Nov 2023 04:44:40 +0100] rev 51330
delta-find: introduce a _DeltaSearch object That object represent the search of a good delta for one revision. It will replace the interleaved generator currently in use. It will make the logic more explicit and easier to split into different subclass for the algorithm variant. We will move content gradually before doing deeper rework. For now, we only move the `_candidategroups` function here. More will follow in the same series.
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:58:54 +0100 delta-find: add a small docstring to deltacomputer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:58:54 +0100] rev 51329
delta-find: add a small docstring to deltacomputer As we are about to introduce another object related to finding delta. So lets have a minimal docstring to the existing one.
Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:41:54 +0100 revlog: stop using `atomictmp` for the split revlog
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:41:54 +0100] rev 51328
revlog: stop using `atomictmp` for the split revlog Since we already manually deal with writing on the side and delaying visibily, we no longer need this.
Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:39:31 +0100 changelog: drop the side_write argument to revlog splitting
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:39:31 +0100] rev 51327
changelog: drop the side_write argument to revlog splitting The only user is now gone.
Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:35:52 +0100 changelog: stop useless enforcing split at the end of transaction
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:35:52 +0100] rev 51326
changelog: stop useless enforcing split at the end of transaction Changelogs are no longer created inline, and existing changelogs are automatically split. Since we now enforce splitting at the start of any write, we don't need to enforce splitting at the end of the transaction. This has the nice side effect of killing the only user of "side_write".
Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:52:13 +0100 branching: merge stable into default
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:52:13 +0100] rev 51325
branching: merge stable into default
Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:35:02 +0100 contrib: add a set of scripts to run pytype in Docker
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:35:02 +0100] rev 51324
contrib: add a set of scripts to run pytype in Docker Having a simple way to run pytype for developers can massively shorten development cycle. Using the same Docker image and scripts that we use on our CI guarantees that the result achieved locally will be very similar to (if not the same as) the output of our CI runners. Things to note: the Dockerfile needs to do a little dance around user permissions inside /home/ci-runner/ because: - on one hand, creating new files on the host (e.g. .pyi files inside .pytype/) should use host user's uid and gid - on the other hand, when we run the image as uid:gid of host user, it needs to be able to read/execute files inside the image that are owned by ci-runner Since local user's uid might be different from ci-runner's uid, we execute this very broad chmod command inside /home/ci-runner/, but then run the image as the host user's uid:gid. There might be a better way to do this.
Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:52:17 -0300 pytype: use "$(hg root)" instead of `hg root` to make shellcheck happier
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:52:17 -0300] rev 51323
pytype: use "$(hg root)" instead of `hg root` to make shellcheck happier
Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:40:48 -0300 pytype: update check-pytype.sh to select target automatically
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:40:48 -0300] rev 51322
pytype: update check-pytype.sh to select target automatically We have python3.11 on CI, so we can run pytype targeting that version. On the other hand, we don't have python3.7 on CI anymore, so we can't run pytype for 3.7 anymore (interpreter not found). I think it's fine to make pytype select the appropriate target depending on the version of the interpreter it's running under.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:54:52 +0100 git-hgext: adjust to the lack of `changelog.heads` method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:54:52 +0100] rev 51321
git-hgext: adjust to the lack of `changelog.heads` method We don't have a `heads` method returning nodeid, but this is very easy to get the same result. This was flagged by pytype. We can note that the fact this code did not break is probably a good sign that it is dead code. However this is a question outside of the scop of this series.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:21:31 +0100 remotefilelog: drop dead code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:21:31 +0100] rev 51320
remotefilelog: drop dead code As pytype flagged bug in this method it highlighted that this methode being never called anywhere.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:07:59 +0100 pytype: use the right signature for the `__delitem__`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:07:59 +0100] rev 51319
pytype: use the right signature for the `__delitem__` It is not because it is NotImplemented that it should use a bad signature. Fix it to please pytype.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:07:21 +0100 pytype: use the right signature for the `__setitem__`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:07:21 +0100] rev 51318
pytype: use the right signature for the `__setitem__` It is not because it is NotImplemented that it should use a bad signature. Fix it to please pytype.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:03:34 +0100 sparse: use with statement for wlock
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:03:34 +0100] rev 51317
sparse: use with statement for wlock This will avoid pytype complaining about the try/except range.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:00:47 +0100 remotefilelog: adjust the signature of basepack.createindex
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:00:47 +0100] rev 51316
remotefilelog: adjust the signature of basepack.createindex pytype point that the subclass signature have been updated.
Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:19:19 +0100 pytype: add the couple annotations for pytype to understands the lrunode
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:19:19 +0100] rev 51315
pytype: add the couple annotations for pytype to understands the lrunode After loosing 2d6 SAN, I eventually understood that pytype was confused by method return type. Pytype is now happy.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:40:06 +0100 pytype: ignore some signature mismatch in registrar
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:40:06 +0100] rev 51314
pytype: ignore some signature mismatch in registrar pytype is grumpy about a sub method having a different signature than the one we use here. pytype error: internalmerge: Overriding method signature mismatch [signature-mismatch] Base signature: 'def _funcregistrarbase._extrasetup(self, name, func) -> Any'. Subclass signature: 'def internalmerge._extrasetup(self, name, func, mergetype, onfailure = None, precheck = None, binary = False, symlink = False) -> Any'. Parameter 'mergetype' must have a default value.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:38:46 +0100 hgweb: update _runwsgi try/except range to be valid
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:38:46 +0100] rev 51313
hgweb: update _runwsgi try/except range to be valid The `tmpl` variable is used in the `except` and `finally`, so we need it created before the `try` is open.
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:36:52 +0100 pytype: add type information for `annotateresult.lines`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:36:52 +0100] rev 51312
pytype: add type information for `annotateresult.lines` This seems to appease a confused pytype.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -60 +60 +100 +300 tip