Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:59:14 -0400 phase-shelve: correct unicode string to honor 'shelve.store=internal'
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> [Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:59:14 -0400] rev 49481
phase-shelve: correct unicode string to honor 'shelve.store=internal' In the case of strip-based shelves, there should be no hidden commit found. That's because shelve.store=internal is necessary but not sufficient to enable phase-based shelves; internal-phase must also be set.
Fri, 12 Aug 2022 14:35:34 -0700 status: include `repo` in template context also for resolved paths
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 12 Aug 2022 14:35:34 -0700] rev 49480
status: include `repo` in template context also for resolved paths The `repo` object needs to be in the templater context when using e.g. `relpath`. It has been missing there since it was the unresolved files were added to the templated output in 07ebb567e8bb.
Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:15:04 -0400 shelve: remove strip and rely on prior state (issue6735)
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> [Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:15:04 -0400] rev 49479
shelve: remove strip and rely on prior state (issue6735)
Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:17:15 -0400 shelve: in test for trailing whitespace, strip commit (issue6735)
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> [Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:17:15 -0400] rev 49478
shelve: in test for trailing whitespace, strip commit (issue6735)
Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:26:01 -0400 shelve: demonstrate that the state is different across platforms (issue6735)
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> [Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:26:01 -0400] rev 49477
shelve: demonstrate that the state is different across platforms (issue6735)
Tue, 16 Aug 2022 20:09:31 +0200 phase: rename the requirement for internal-phase (BC)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 16 Aug 2022 20:09:31 +0200] rev 49476
phase: rename the requirement for internal-phase (BC) The previous requirements covers both `internal` and `archived` phase. However, the `archived` phase is not ready for usage (while the internal one is mostly ready for years). So we split the archived on in a dedicated requirements (see previous changeset for details) and rename the one for internal-phase. This will avoid older client trying to use the archived phase on `internal` only repositories. Since the requirements stayed experimental since its introduction. It seems fine to drop the previous version.
Tue, 16 Aug 2022 19:04:23 +0200 phase: introduce a dedicated requirement for the `archived` phase
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 16 Aug 2022 19:04:23 +0200] rev 49475
phase: introduce a dedicated requirement for the `archived` phase See inline documentation for details.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip