dagop: fix typo spotted while doing unrelated investigation Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4584

hg: don't reuse repo instance after unshare() Unsharing a repository is a pretty invasive procedure and fundamentally changes the behavior of the repository. Currently, hg.unshare() calls into localrepository.__init__ to re-initialize the repository instance. This is a bit hacky. And future commits that refactor how localrepository instances are constructed will make this difficult to support. This commit changes unshare() so it constructs a new repo instance once the unshare I/O has completed. It then poisons the old repo instance so any further use will result in error. Surprisingly, nothing in core appears to access a repo instance after it has been unshared! .. api:: ``hg.unshare()`` now poisons the repo instance so it can't be used. It also returns a new repo instance suitable for interacting with the unshared repository. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4557

unionrepo: dynamically create repository type from base repository This is basically the same thing we just did for bundlerepo except for union repositories. .. api:: ``unionrepo.unionrepository()`` is no longer usable on its own. To instantiate an instance, call ``unionrepo.instance()`` or ``unionrepo.makeunionrepository()``. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4556

bundlerepo: dynamically create repository type from base repository Previously, bundlerepository inherited from localrepo.localrepository. You simply instantiated a bundlerepository and its __init__ called localrepo.localrepository.__init__. Things were simple. Unfortunately, this strategy is limiting because it assumes that the base repository is a localrepository instance. And it assumes various properties of localrepository, such as the arguments its __init__ takes. And it prevents us from changing behavior of localrepository.__init__ without also having to change derived classes. Previous and ongoing work to abstract storage revealed these limitations. This commit changes the initialization strategy of bundle repositories to dynamically create a type to represent the repository. Instead of a static type, we instantiate a new local repo instance via localrepo.instance(). We then combine its __class__ with bundlerepository to produce a new type. This ensures that no matter how localrepo.instance() decides to create a repository object, we can derive a bundle repo object from it. i.e. localrepo.instance() could return a type that isn't a localrepository and it would "just work." Well, it would "just work" if bundlerepository's custom implementations only accessed attributes in the documented repository interface. I'm pretty sure it violates the interface contract in a handful of places. But we can worry about that another day. This change gets us closer to doing more clever things around instantiating repository instances without having to worry about teaching bundlerepository about them. .. api:: ``bundlerepo.bundlerepository`` is no longer usable on its own. The class is combined with the class of the base repository it is associated with at run-time. New bundlerepository instances can be obtained by calling ``bundlerepo.instance()`` or ``bundlerepo.makebundlerepository()``. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4555

bundlerepo: factor out code for instantiating a bundle repository This code will soon become a bit more complicated. So extract to its own function. And change both instantiators of bundlerepository to use it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4554

bundlerepo: pass create=True I don't want to know how this came to be. Maybe a holdover from the days before Python had a bool type? Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4553