Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:23:55 +0900] rev 37162
templater: drop bool support from evalastype()
Future patches will split evalastype() into two functions, evalrawexp()
and unwrapastype(), so we can catch the exception of type conversion.
# evaluating function may bubble up inner ParseError
thing = evalrawexp(context, mapping, arg)
try:
return unwrapastype(context, thing)
except ParseError:
# add hint and reraise
However, evalboolean() can't be factored out in this way since it has to
process boolean-like symbols as non keyword. Fortunately, it's unlikely
that we'll need a general type converter supporting bool, so this patch
drops it from the table.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:13:06 +0900] rev 37161
templater: do not use stringify() to concatenate flattened template output
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:04:20 +0900] rev 37160
templateutil: reimplement stringify() using flatten()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:00:54 +0900] rev 37159
templateutil: move flatten() from templater
It's the same kind of utility as stringify().
Connor Sheehan <sheehan@mozilla.com> [Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:01:13 -0400] rev 37158
stringutil: move person function from templatefilters
Move the person function from template filters to the stringutil
module, so it can be reused in the mailmap template function.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2960
Connor Sheehan <sheehan@mozilla.com> [Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:48:22 -0400] rev 37157
stringutil: add isauthorwellformed function
The regular expression for this function formerly lived at
https://hg.mozilla.org/hgcustom/version-control-tools/file/tip/hghooks/mozhghooks/author_format.py#l13
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2959
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 17 Mar 2018 02:37:46 -0400] rev 37156
test-lfs-test-server: add a testcase for `hg serve`
I haven't figured out yet how to make the authentication checks work for a
specific list of users, so the 'web.allow-push' list is wildcarded. (It appears
that the client doesn't react to a 401 by sending authentication data, which may
be caused in part by not having all of the headers in httpbasicauthhandler's
http_error_auth_reqed(), compared to a run of test-http.t. But in any case, we
should probably have a separate set of tests for various authentication
scenarios. As it is, without the wildcard, no push access is granted.)
There are several deviations from the `lfs-test-server` case:
- `hg serve` emits a Server header. I think Gregory indicated that this isn't
easily suppressed.
- `hg serve` names the "basic" transfer handler in the Batch API response. Not
having to specify it was for backwards compatability, so this seems like the
right thing to do. (`lfs-test-server` doesn't name it, whether it was
explicitly requested by the client or not.)
- PUT status for a newly created file is 201, per RFC-2616 [1]. The Basic
Transfer API [2] shows an example upload transcript with a 200 response. It
doesn't make much sense to re-upload a file (unless it is corrupt) in an
example, but I wouldn't be surprised if some other implementations also
expect 200 because of this. But the RFC says MUST use 201 for creation.
- The Content-Type for the file transfers is "application/octet-stream", like
the sample transcript (though I don't see it explicitly called out in the
text elsewhere). Using "text/plain" seems clearly wrong.
- `lfs-test-server` isn't removing the action property and sending back an
error code like the spec calls out when a file is missing or corrupt. Doing
so on the `hg serve` side reveals a bug in our client code when handling the
response- it indicates the remote file is missing instead of corrupt around
line 452.
I'll probably glob over the Content-Length differences once this settles down.
Prior to the recent hgweb refactoring, the Batch API response was using chunked
encodings instead.
Back to the RFC, I have no idea if the python framework handles the "MUST NOT
ignore any Content-* (e.g. Content-Range) headers that it does not understand or
implement and MUST return a 501" for a PUT request.
[1] https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html#sec9.6
[2] https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/basic-transfers.md#uploads