Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:20:11 -0800 wireprotoserver: remove redirect() and restore() (API)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:20:11 -0800] rev 36106
wireprotoserver: remove redirect() and restore() (API) These methods on the protocol handler interface are no longer used in core. .. api:: redirect() and restore() have been removed from the wire protocol handler interface. Use mayberedirectstdio() instead. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2083
Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:19:06 -0800 wireproto: use maybecapturestdio() for push responses (API)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:19:06 -0800] rev 36105
wireproto: use maybecapturestdio() for push responses (API) The "pushres" and "pusherr" response types currently call proto.restore() in the HTTP protocol. This completes the pairing with proto.redirect() that occurs in the @wireprotocommand functions. (But since the SSH protocol has a no-op redirect(), it doesn't bother calling restore() because it would also be a no-op.) Having the disconnect between these paired calls is very confusing. Knowing that you must use proto.redirect() if returning a "pushres" or a "pusherr" is even wonkier. We replace this confusing code with our new context manager for [maybe] capturing output. The "pushres" and "pusherr" types have gained an "output" argument to their constructor and an attribute to hold captured data. The HTTP protocol now retrieves output from these objects. .. api:: ``wireproto.pushres`` and ``wireproto.pusherr`` now explicitly track stdio output. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2082
Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:17:47 -0800 wireprotoserver: add context manager mechanism for redirecting stdio
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:17:47 -0800] rev 36104
wireprotoserver: add context manager mechanism for redirecting stdio Today, proto.redirect() sets up redirecting stdio and proto.restore() undoes that. The API is a bit wonky because restore() is only implemented on the HTTP protocol. Furthermore, not all calls to redirect() are obviously paired with calls to restore(). For example, the call to restore() for "unbundle" requests is handled by the response handler for the HTTP protocol. This commit introduces a new method on the protocol handler interface to maybe capture stdio. It emits a file object or None depending on whether stdio capture is used by the transport. To prove it works, the "pushkey" wire protocol command has been updated to use the new API. I'm not convinced this is the best mechanism to capture stdio. I may need to come up with something better once the new wire protocol emerges into existence. But it is strictly better than before because it removes variance in the wire protocol handler interface. It therefore gets us closer to a unified interface between the SSH and HTTP transports. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2081
Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:17:05 -0800 wireprotoserver: split ssh protocol handler and server
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:17:05 -0800] rev 36103
wireprotoserver: split ssh protocol handler and server We want to formalize the interface for protocol handlers. Today, server functionality (which is domain specific) is interleaved with protocol handling functionality (which conforms to a generic interface) in the sshserver class. This commit splits the ssh protocol handling code out of the sshserver class. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2080
Wed, 07 Feb 2018 21:04:54 -0800 wireprotoserver: extract SSH response handling functions
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Feb 2018 21:04:54 -0800] rev 36102
wireprotoserver: extract SSH response handling functions The lookup/dispatch table was cute. But it isn't needed. Future refactors will benefit from the handlers for individual response types living outside the class. As part of this, I snuck in a change that changes a type compare from str to bytes. This has no effect on Python 2. But it might make Python 3 a bit happier. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2091
Sat, 23 Dec 2017 15:13:37 +0530 remotenames: introduce new template keywords for remotenames
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sat, 23 Dec 2017 15:13:37 +0530] rev 36101
remotenames: introduce new template keywords for remotenames This patch introduces three new template keywords 'remotenames', 'remotebookmarks', 'remotebranches' to show remotenames, remotebookmarks and remotebranches associated to a changeset. This is a part of moving hgremotenames extension to core. The remotenames template keyword was present in the extension and the rest of the two are not present in the hgremotenames extension and are introduced in this patch. hgremotenames: https://bitbucket.org/seanfarley/hgremotenames Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1759
Sat, 23 Dec 2017 14:24:41 +0530 remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sat, 23 Dec 2017 14:24:41 +0530] rev 36100
remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches This patch adds two new namespaces which will be enabled by remotenames extension. The namespaces are remotebookmarks and remotebranches. Adding them as namespaces will show them in various commands' output such as log, show work. This will also unable to access changesets using that name. Tests are also added for the same. This is a part of moving hgremotenames extension to core. hgremotenames: https://bitbucket.org/seanfarley/hgremotenames Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1758
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip