Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:56:54 -0400 revset: add the 'subrepo' symbol
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:56:54 -0400] rev 24446
revset: add the 'subrepo' symbol This returns the csets where matching subrepos have changed with respect to the containing repo's first parent. The second parent shouldn't matter, because it is either syncing up to the first parent (i.e. it hasn't changed from the current branch's POV), or the merge changed it with respect to the first parent (which already adds it to the set). There's already a 'subrepo' fileset, but it is prefixed with 'set:', so there should be no ambiguity (in code anyway). The only test I see for it is to revert subrepos named by a glob pattern (in test-subrepo.t, line 58). Since it doesn't return a tracked file, neither 'log "set:subrepo()"' nor 'files "set:subrepo()"' print anything. Therefore, it seems useful to have a revset that will return something for log (and can be added to a revsetalias to be chained with 'file' revsets.) It might be nice to be able to filter for added, modified and removed separately, but add/remove should be rare. It might also be nice to be able to do a 'contains' check, in addition to this mutated check. Maybe it is possible to get those with the existing 'adds', 'contains', 'modifies' and 'removes' by teaching them to chase explicit paths into subrepos. I'm not sure if this should be added to the 'modifies adds removes' line in revset.optimize() (since it is doing an AMR check on .hgsubstate), or if it is OK to put into 'safesymbols' (things like 'file' are on the list, and that takes a regex, among other patterns).
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:28:39 -0700 tags: improve documentation
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:28:39 -0700] rev 24445
tags: improve documentation The documentation for tags.py was making comprehension difficult. This patch rewrites most of the comments in the file to make it easier for mere mortals to understand what's going on.
Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:14:27 -0700 phase: default to C implementation for phase computation
Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com> [Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:14:27 -0700] rev 24444
phase: default to C implementation for phase computation
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:00:09 -0700 phase: compute phases in C
Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com> [Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:00:09 -0700] rev 24443
phase: compute phases in C Previously, the phase computation would grow much slower as the oldest draft commit in the repository grew older (which is very common in repos with evolve on) and the number of commits increase. By rewriting the computation in C we can speed it up from 700ms to 7ms on a large repository whose oldest draft commit is a year old.
Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:16:10 -0500 manifest: move C bool polyfill into util.h
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:16:10 -0500] rev 24442
manifest: move C bool polyfill into util.h
Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:13:11 -0500 manifest: use util.h to get Py_ssize_t
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:13:11 -0500] rev 24441
manifest: use util.h to get Py_ssize_t
Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:28:11 -0400 clone: add progress support to hardlink clones (issue3059)
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:28:11 -0400] rev 24440
clone: add progress support to hardlink clones (issue3059)
Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:24:22 -0400 util: add progress callback support to copyfiles
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:24:22 -0400] rev 24439
util: add progress callback support to copyfiles
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:04:51 -0700 revert: evaluate filesets against working directory (issue4497)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:04:51 -0700] rev 24438
revert: evaluate filesets against working directory (issue4497) As the failing revert tests in test-fileset-generated.t show, Revert currently creates one matcher for matching files in the working copy and another matcher for matching files in the target revision. The two matchers are created with different contexts, which means filesets are evaluated differently. Then the union of the sets of files matching the matchers in the two contexts are reverted. It doesn't seem to make sense to use two different matchers; only the context they're applied to should be different. It seems very likely that the user wants the filesets to be evaluated against the working directory, which the tests test-fileset-generated.t also assume, so let's make it so. I willingly admit that the largefiles code was modified by trial and error (according to tests).
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:27:56 -0700 largefiles: extract and reuse 'standin' variable in overriderevert()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:27:56 -0700] rev 24437
largefiles: extract and reuse 'standin' variable in overriderevert()
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip