Fri, 05 Apr 2024 14:13:47 +0200 phases: use revision number in `_pushdiscoveryphase`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 05 Apr 2024 14:13:47 +0200] rev 51609
phases: use revision number in `_pushdiscoveryphase` We now reach our target checkpoint in terms of rev-num conversion. The `_pushdiscoveryphase` function is now performing graph computation based on revision number only. Avoiding repeated conversion from node-id to rev-num. See previous changeset updated `new_heads` for rationnal. Again, time saved in the 100 milliseconds order of magnitude for the mozilla-try benchmark I have been using. However, wow that the logic is done using revision number, we can look into having better logic in the next changesets, which will provide a much bigger speedup.
Fri, 05 Apr 2024 14:11:02 +0200 phases: move RemotePhasesSummary to revision number
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 05 Apr 2024 14:11:02 +0200] rev 51608
phases: move RemotePhasesSummary to revision number This continue our quest to align more logic on revision number instead of node-ids. The motivation is similar to the change to `new_heads` and `analyze_remote_phases` a few changeset earlier. Again, we take this as an opportunity to rename the class, and the attribute to the new naming scheme. This will highlight the need for code update for any code using it an expecting node-ids. Many of the rev-num → node-id conversion we had to introduce in the previous changesets can now be removed. More will be removed in the future as we continue to align code toward rev-num usage. time saved in the 100 milliseconds order of magnitude for the mozilla-try benchmark I have been using.
Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:24:47 +0200 phases: stop using `repo.set` in `remotephasessummary`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:24:47 +0200] rev 51607
phases: stop using `repo.set` in `remotephasessummary` The `repository.set` create changectx on the fly, an expensive operation. Using `repo.revs` and a direct rev-num → node-id translation will be significantly faster. This is especially true as we prepare ourself to no longer do the rev-num → node-id transalation there. The speedup is a bit lost in the overall noisyness of the slow phase discovery algorithm, but it save a small amount of time in my benchmark.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 tip