Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:02:54 -0700 update: correct description of --check option stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:02:54 -0700] rev 29018
update: correct description of --check option The old "update across branches if no uncommitted changes" made it sound like updating across branches (with no uncommitted changes) was allowed only with this option, which was not true. Also, the option did not care whether it was linear or across branches. Instead, it checked that there were no uncommitted changes. Let's explain what it does instead of trying to suggest what happens without it.
Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:32:59 -0700 util: fix race in makedirs() stable
Adam Simpkins <simpkins@fb.com> [Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:32:59 -0700] rev 29017
util: fix race in makedirs() Update makedirs() to ignore EEXIST in case someone else has already created the directory in question. Previously the ensuredirs() function existed, and was nearly identical to makedirs() except that it fixed this race. Unfortunately ensuredirs() was only used in 3 places, and most code uses the racy makedirs() function. This fixes makedirs() to be non-racy, and replaces calls to ensuredirs() with makedirs(). In particular, mercurial.scmutil.origpath() used the racy makedirs() code, which could cause failures during "hg update" as it tried to create backup directories. This does slightly change the behavior of call sites using ensuredirs(): previously ensuredirs() would throw EEXIST if the path existed but was a regular file instead of a directory. It did this by explicitly checking os.path.isdir() after getting EEXIST. The makedirs() code did not do this and swallowed all EEXIST errors. I kept the makedirs() behavior, since it seemed preferable to avoid the extra stat call in the common case where this directory already exists. If the path does happen to be a file, the caller will almost certainly fail with an ENOTDIR error shortly afterwards anyway. I checked the 3 existing call sites of ensuredirs(), and this seems to be the case for them.
Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:35:30 +0900 chg: initialize sockdirfd to -1 instead of AT_FDCWD stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:35:30 +0900] rev 29016
chg: initialize sockdirfd to -1 instead of AT_FDCWD As we don't use sockdirfd yet, this is the simplest workaround to compile chg on old Unices where AT_FDCWD does not exist. Foozy pointed out Mac OS X 10.10 is required for AT_FDCWD as well as xxxat() functions.
Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:38:02 -0500 bdiff: further restrain potential quadratic performance stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:38:02 -0500] rev 29015
bdiff: further restrain potential quadratic performance This causes the longest_match search to limit itself to a window of 30000 lines during search (roughly 1MB), thus avoiding a full O(N*M) search that might occur in repetitive structured inputs. For a particular class of many MB pathological test cases, this generated the following timings: size before after 10x 1.25s 1.24s 100x 57s 33s 1000x >8400s 400s The times on the right quickly become much faster and appear more linear. While windowing means deltas are no longer "optimal", the resulting deltas were within a couple percent of expected size. While we've yet to have a report of a file with the level of repetition necessary to hit this case, some JSON/XML database dump scenario is fairly likely to hit it. This may also slightly improve the average-case performance for deltas of large binaries.
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:04:11 -0500 bdiff: balance recursion to avoid quadratic behavior (issue4704) stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:04:11 -0500] rev 29014
bdiff: balance recursion to avoid quadratic behavior (issue4704) For highly structured files like JSON or XML dumps with large numbers of duplicate lines (eg braces) and isolated matching lines, bdiff could find large numbers of equally good spans. Because it prefers earlier matches, this would result in pathologically unbalance recursion that resulted in quadratic performance. This patch makes it prefer matches closer to the middle that tend to balance recursion. This change improves the speed of a pathological test case from 1100s to 9s. Included is a smaller test that has a roughly 50x safety margin on the performance it accepts. It's likely to fail on pure builds because difflib also has a recursion-balancing problem.
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:05:26 -0500 bdiff: deal better with duplicate lines stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:05:26 -0500] rev 29013
bdiff: deal better with duplicate lines The longest_match code compares all the possible positions in two files to find the best match. Given a pair of sequences, it effectively searches a grid like this: a b b b c . d e . f 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a 1 - - - - - - - - - b - 2 1 1 - - - - - - b - 1 3 2 - - - - - - b - 1 2 4 - - - - - - . - - - - - 1 - - 1 - Here, the 4 in the middle says "the first four lines of the file match", which it can compute be comparing the fourth lines and then adding one to the result found when comparing the third lines in the entry to the upper left. We generally avoid the quadratic worst case by only looking at lines that match, which is precomputed. We also avoid quadratic storage by only keeping a single column vector and then keeping track of the best match. Unfortunately, this can get us into trouble with the sequences above. Because we want to reuse the '3' value when calculating the '4', we need to be careful not to overwrite it with the '2' we calculate immediately before. If we scan left to right, top to bottom, we're going to have a problem: we'll overwrite our 3 before we use it and calculate a suboptimal best match. To address this, we can either keep two column vectors and swap between them (which significantly complicates bookkeeping), or change our scanning order. If we instead scan from left to right, bottom to top, we'll avoid ever overwriting values we'll need in the future. This unfortunately needs several changes to be made simultaneously: - change the order we build the initial hash chains for the b sequence - change the sentinel values from INT_MAX to -1 - change the visit order in the longest_match inner loop - add a tie-breaker preference for earlier matches This last is needed because we previously had an implicit tie-breaker from our visitation order that our test suite relies on. Later matches can also trigger a bug in the normalization code in diff().
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip