dirstate: mark `clear` and `rebuild` as `require_changing_parents` Yeah, more scoping!

dirstate: add a comment about the semantic of `dirstate.clear` This method is weird, lets flag it as such.

debugrebuildstate: wrap the operation in a `changing_parents` context This ismaybe a "changing_files" case? However this would be the only usage of `rebuild` outside a `changing_parents` context and this is a debug command, so lets not make the code base more complex because of that one command.

strip: use a `changing_parents` context for --keep update These are now properly scoped. note: it would be neat to reuse this in `hg rollback`.

mq: wrap the dirstate's rebuild in a `changing_parents` context This code is dealing with `qreshesh` failure. In that case the working copy will be left on the parent of the refreshed patch, so the parents are changing and `changing_parents` make sens.

lfconvert: use a `changing_parents` context to clear the dirstate Not sure if this is the right context, but it works and it is consistent with the other usages of `dirstate.clear`.

dirstate: mark the `copy` method as requiring a `changing_any` context This is used both when changing parents (e.g. merging with rename) and changing files (e.g. running `hg rename`).

dirstate: add a `require_changing_any` decorator We will need it for a couple of usecase (e.g `dirstate.copy`).

rebase: scope parent change into a changing_parents context If we are actually altering the working copy (i.e. we are not in memory), we should properly scope the working copy update.

dirstate: requires being in a `changing_parents` `context to set_parents` Enforcing proper operation scoping on all methods that mutate the dirstate will tighten correctness and reduce the risk of bugs. The context to use for this method is obvious, and all code was already compliant ☺

dirstate: invalidate on all exceptions Previously, we would miss SystemExit, KeyboardInterrupt etc. This "fix" on the bug tested in "test-largefiles-update.t" by preventing the precisely tested situation to happens at all. However this reveal a similar bug with a different timing. I have not been able to deal with that pre-existing bug so far. So I updated the test to point that out.

large-files: prepare a test for more changes The behavior around this test is about to change. We update the test to make it more robust and the changes clearer.