Sun, 01 Sep 2019 18:06:31 +0900 rust-cpython: mark unsafe functions as such
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 01 Sep 2019 18:06:31 +0900] rev 42857
rust-cpython: mark unsafe functions as such It wasn't trivial to fix leak_immutable() to be safe since we have to allow immutable operations (e.g. iter()) on the leaked reference. So let's mark it unsafe for now. Callers must take care of the returned object to guarantee the memory safety. I'll revisit this later. I think $leaked<T: 'static> could have a function that converts itself into $leaked<U: 'static> with a given FnOnce(&T) -> &U, where T is $inner_struct, and U is $iterator_type for example.
Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:48:24 +0900 rust-cpython: pair leaked reference with its manager object
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:48:24 +0900] rev 42856
rust-cpython: pair leaked reference with its manager object Still leak_immutable() is unsafe since leak_handle must live longer than the leaked_ref.
Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:37:30 +0900 rust-cpython: introduce restricted variant of RefCell
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:37:30 +0900] rev 42855
rust-cpython: introduce restricted variant of RefCell This should catch invalid borrow_mut() calls. Still the ref-sharing interface is unsafe.
Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:35:14 +0900 rust-cpython: fix unsafe inner(py).borrow_mut() calls
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:35:14 +0900] rev 42854
rust-cpython: fix unsafe inner(py).borrow_mut() calls Since self.inner is managed by PySharedState, it must not be borrowed mutably through the RefCell interface. Otherwise, the underlying object could be mutated while a reference is leaked to Python world.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip