Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:01:06 +0900 Fixing issue1542, adding a relevant test
Nicolas Dumazet <nicdumz.commits@gmail.com> [Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:01:06 +0900] rev 7892
Fixing issue1542, adding a relevant test inotify is smart enough to notify you about any changes in a directory, even if you only watch the directory, and none if its contents: the recursive add_watch I added was unnecessary. The only thing that matters here is the recursive status update on directory deletion. And scan() has to be called _before_ the deferred call is registered. (race condition: depending on the times, the previous patch could apparently fail on the provided test. It's not the case anymore.)
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:28:09 +0100 rebase: remove unused statement
Stefano Tortarolo <stefano.tortarolo@gmail.com> [Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:28:09 +0100] rev 7891
rebase: remove unused statement
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:54:44 -0500 util: split out posix, windows, and win32 modules
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:54:44 -0500] rev 7890
util: split out posix, windows, and win32 modules
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip