addremove: pass command-level similarity value down to scmutil.addremove() Since we've changed to carry a similarity value by opts dict, it makes sense to leave a string '0'-'100' value unmodified.

setup: add overlooked hgext.infinitepush package declaration Will fix infinitepush tests that have been failing when run without --local. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3038

tests: remove dependence on repo.changectx() This was one of few remaining uses of repo.changectx() in core. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3036

log: remove dependence on repo.changectx() This was one of few remaining uses of repo.changectx() in core. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3035

verify: remove dependence on repo.changectx() This was one of few remaining uses of repo.changectx() in core. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3034

bookmarks: switch from repo.changectx('.') to repo['.'] The two forms are synonymous and the new form is by far the more common form. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3033

stringutil: add function to pretty print an object This is inspired by the pprint() module/function (which we can't use because the output is different on Python 2 and 3 - namely the use of b'' literals). We hook it up to `hg debugwireproto` for printing the response to a wire protocol command. This foreshadows future peer work, which will support decoding CBOR responses into rich data structures. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2987

wireproto: add frame flag to denote payloads as CBOR We may eventually want a separate frame type for this. But for now this is the easiest to implement. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2986

wireproto: implement custom __repr__ for frame This version won't print the full payload (which could be large). It also prints human friendly values for types and flags. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2985

keepalive: implement readinto() This is part of the standard I/O interface. It is used by the framing protocol. So we need to implement it so frames can be decoded. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2984

wireproto: port protocol handler to zope.interface zope.interface is superior to the abc module. Let's port to it. As part of this, we add tests for interface conformance for classes implementing the interface. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2983

wireproto: separate commands tables for version 1 and 2 commands We can't easily reuse existing command handlers for version 2 commands because the response types will be different. e.g. many commands return nodes encoded as hex. Our new wire protocol is binary safe, so we'll wish to encode nodes as binary. We /could/ teach each command handler to look at the protocol handler and change behavior based on the version in use. However, this would make logic a bit unwieldy over time and would make it harder to design a unified protocol handler interface. I think it's better to create a clean break between version 1 and version 2 of commands on the server. What I imagine happening is we will have separate @wireprotocommand functions for each protocol generation. Those functions will parse the request, dispatch to a common function to process it, then generate the response in its own, transport-specific manner. This commit establishes a separate table for tracking version 1 commands from version 2 commands. The HTTP server pieces have been updated to use this new table. Most commands are marked as both version 1 and version 2, so there is little practical impact to this change. A side-effect of this change is we now rely on transport registration in wireprototypes.TRANSPORTS and certain properties of the protocol interface. So a test had to be updated to conform. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2982

wireproto: mark SSHv2 as a version 1 transport The version component is used for filtering/routing wire protocol commands to their proper handler. The actual version 2 of the wire protocol commands will use a different encoding of responses. We already have tests using the version 2 SSH transport and version 2 of the wire protocol commands won't be implemented atomically. This commit marks the SSHv2 transport as version 1 so it will still invoke the version 1 commands. Once the commands are all implemented in version 2, we can restore its proper behavior. Some tests had to be disabled as a result of this change. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2981

wireproto: stop aliasing wire protocol types (API) We generally shy away from aliasing module symbols. I think I was keeping this around for API compatibility. We've already made tons of other API breaks in the wire protocol code this release. What's one more? .. api:: ``wireproto`` module no longer re-exports various types used to define responses to wire protocol commands. Access these types from the ``wireprototypes`` module. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2979

wireproto: use CBOR for command requests Now that we're using CBOR in the new wire protocol, let's convert command requests to it. Before I wrote this patch and was even thinking about CBOR, I was thinking about how commands should be issued and came to the conclusion that we didn't need separate frames to represent the command name from its arguments. I already had a partially completed patch prepared to merge the frames. But with CBOR, it makes the implementation a bit simpler because we don't need to roll our own serialization. The changes here are a bit invasive. I tried to split this into multiple commits to make it easier to review. But it was just too hard. * "command name" and "command argument" frames have been collapsed into a "command request" frame. * The flags for this new frame are totally different. * Frame processing has been overhauled to reflect the new order of things. * Test fallout was significant. A handful of tests were removed. Altogether, I think the new code is simpler. We don't have complicated state around receiving commands. We're either receiving command request frames or command data frames. We /could/ potentially collapse command data frames into command request frames. Although I'd have to think a bit more about this before I do it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2951