largefiles: fix a spurious missing file warning with forget (issue4053) If an uncommitted and deleted file was forgotten, a warning would be emitted, even though the operation was successful. See the previous patch for 'remove -A' for the exact circumstances, and details about the cause.

largefiles: fix a spurious missing file warning with 'remove -A' (issue4053) The bug report doesn't mention largefiles, but the given recipe doesn't fail unless the largefiles extension is loaded. The problem only affected normal files, whether or not any largefiles are committed, and only files that have not been committed yet. (Files with an 'a' state are dropped from dirstate, not marked removed.) Further, if the named normal file never existed, the warning would be printed out twice. The problem is that the core implementation of remove() calls repo.status(), which eventually triggers a dirstate.walk(). When the file isn't seen in the filesystem during the walk, the exception handling finds the file in dirstate, so it doesn't complain. However, the largefiles implementation called status() again with all of the original files (including the normal ones, just dropped). This time, the exception handler doesn't find the file in dirstate and does complain. This simply excludes the normal files from the second repo.status() call, which the largefiles extension has no interest is processing anyway.

largefiles: introduce the 'composelargefilematcher()' method This is a copy/paste (with the necessary tweaks) of the composenormalfilematcher method currently on default, which does the inverse- this trims the normal files out of the matcher. It will be used in the next patch.