test-flagprocessor: add tests about bundlerepo This shows flag processor is broken with a bundle repo. The test creates non-liner history to exercise code path where the deltaparent cannot be reused.

test-flagprocessor: use changegroup3 in bundle2 This will force "hg bundle" to use changegroup3 in the test. It is important since only changegroup3 preserves revlog flags.

bundle: allow bundle command to use changegroup3 in tests Since bundle2 writes changegroup version, we can just reuse the bundle2 format for changegroup3. This won't enable the bundle command to write changegroup3 in the wild, since exchange.parsebundlespec only returns changegroup2. It unlocks tests to override exchange.parsebundlespec and get "hg bundle" write changegroup3.

tests: add per-line output conditionals for Windows

run-tests: support per-line conditional output in tests Duplicating entire tests just because the output is different is both error prone and can make the tests harder to read. This harnesses the existing '(?)' infrastructure, both to improve readability, and because it seemed like the path of least resistance. The form is: $ test_cmd output (hghave-feature !) # required if hghave.has_feature(), else optional out2 (no-hghave-feature2 !) # req if not hghave.has_feature2(), else optional I originally extended the '(?)' syntax. For example, this: 2 r4/.hg/cache/checkisexec (execbit ?) pretty naturally reads as "checkisexec, if execbit". In some ways though, this inverts the meaning of '?'. For '(?)', the line is purely optional. In the example, it is mandatory iff execbit. Otherwise, it is carried forward as optional, to preserve the test output. I tried it the other way, (listing 'no-exec' in the example), but that is too confusing to read. Kostia suggested using '!', and that seems fine.

test-run-tests: pad the failure test to preserve the run order Test size seems to dictate the order in which the tests are run, and the next patch will add to test-success.t. Similar to c0cecc153d25.