hooks: introduce a `:run-with-plain` option for hooks This option control if HGPLAIN should be set or not for the hooks. This is the first step to give user some control of the HGPLAIN setting for they hooks. Some hooks (eg: consistency checking) deserve to be run with HGPLAIN, some other (eg: user set visual helper) might need to respect the user config and setting. So both usage are valid and we need to restore the ability to run -without- HGPLAIN that got lost in Mercurial 5.7. This does not offer a way to restore the pre-5.7 behavior yet (respect whatever HGPLAIN setting from the shell), this will be dealt with in the next changeset. The option name is a bit verbose because implementing this highlighs the need for another option: `:run-if-plain`. That would make it possible for some hooks to be easily disabled if HG PLAIN is set. However such option would be a new feature, not something introduced to mitigate a behavior change introduced in 5.7, so the `:run-if-plain` option belong to the default branch and is not part of this series. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9981

hooks: add some test about HGPLAIN setting and hooks In Mercurial 5.7, hooks are now ran with HGPLAIN set, which is a behavior change in. I could not find explicit test about it so I am adding one. The next changesets will introduce more change to help user mitigate the behavior change when needed. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9979

hooks: forbid ':' in hook name The `:` character is a special separator in the config and it seems same do to the same for hooks. This is necessary to improve the experience around the HGPLAIN behavior change in 5.7. See next changesets for details. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9978

rust-status: honor matcher when using the dirstate-only fast-path (issue6483) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9977

status: add test that shows that the Rust implementation has a bug Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9976

tweak-default: no longer enable the experimental return code The change is quite new and undocumented (since it is experimental) so it seems premature to make it available in tweak default. In addition, I am not sure the new return code are frozen yet (eg: some of the initial feedback have not been incorporated). Before the release I doubled check (probably with Martin) that they were not enabled by default and got replied that they were only enabled in the tests. Have I been aware that they have been also enabled in tweak default I would I have lobbied to delay that. I discovered they were in tweak default from users feedback. They found it an unpleasant and unexpected surprise of 5.7. So I suggest we no enable enable this experimental feature for Mercurial 5.7 and revisit this later, when the feature will be more mature. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9975

cmdutil: add a missing byte prefix to string introduce in 976b26bdd0d8 The change is missing a the `b'foo'` prefix to make it a bytestring. This lead to a traceback in some third party extension. It is unclear to me why the Mercurial test pass without it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9974

relnote: remove the reference to `debugstrip` The `debug` namespace is not intended for end user and advertising it is a path to confusion and trouble. I think we should wait for the `admin` namespace to exists and the command to be available as `admin--strip` before we advertise it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9817

largefiles: properly pass kwargs into url.open The url.open function has acquired a lot of kwargs over the years. When running `hg import http://example.com/hg/diff/1`, since at least a708e1e4d7a8 in March, 2018, the calling sites for url.open try to pass a `sendaccept` parameter that largefiles' override doesn't accept. Currently that stack traces something like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/bin/hg", line 59, in <module> dispatch.run() File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 143, in run status = dispatch(req) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 245, in dispatch status = _rundispatch(req) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 289, in _rundispatch ret = _runcatch(req) or 0 File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 465, in _runcatch return _callcatch(ui, _runcatchfunc) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 475, in _callcatch return scmutil.callcatch(ui, func) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/scmutil.py", line 155, in callcatch return func() File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 455, in _runcatchfunc return _dispatch(req) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 1259, in _dispatch lui, repo, cmd, fullargs, ui, options, d, cmdpats, cmdoptions File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 913, in runcommand ret = _runcommand(ui, options, cmd, d) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 1270, in _runcommand return cmdfunc() File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/dispatch.py", line 1256, in <lambda> d = lambda: util.checksignature(func)(ui, *args, **strcmdopt) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/util.py", line 1867, in check return func(*args, **kwargs) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/commands.py", line 4184, in import_ patchfile = hg.openpath(ui, patchurl, sendaccept=False) File "/tmp/hgtests.sv744r5t/install/lib/python/mercurial/hg.py", line 181, in openpath return url.open(ui, path, sendaccept=sendaccept) TypeError: openlargefile() got an unexpected keyword argument 'sendaccept' So, just accept and pass along any kwargs of the overridden function.

procutil: extend gui test to detect wayland session (issue6479)

Added signature for changeset 0e2e7300f430

Added tag 5.7 for changeset 0e2e7300f430

relnotes: copy "next" to "5.7" and clear "next" The same procedure as every year^Wcycle. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9909

relnotes: elaborate on the side effects of hooks having HGPLAIN=1 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9943

packaging: replace a documentation reference to `python3` on Windows Sadly, there's not `python3.exe` on Windows. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9937

wix: tell ComponentSearch that it is finding a directory (not a file) This is to fix an issue we've noticed where fresh installations start at `C:\Program Files\Mercurial`, and then upgrades "walk up" the tree and end up in `C:\Program Files` and finally `C:\` (where they stay). ComponentSearch defaults to finding files, which I think means "it produces a string like `C:\Program Files\Mercurial`", whereas with the type being explicitly a directory, it would return `C:\Program Files\Mercurial\` (note the final trailing backslash). Presumably, a latter step then tries to turn that file name into a proper directory, by removing everything after the last `\`. This could likely also be fixed by actually searching for the component for hg.exe itself. That seemed a lot more complicated, as the GUID for hg.exe isn't known in this file (it's one of the "auto-derived" ones). We could also consider adding a Condition that I think could check the Property and ensure it's either empty or ends in a trailing slash, but that would be an installer runtime check and I'm not convinced it'd actually be useful. This will *not* cause existing installations that are in one of the bad directories to fix themselves. Doing that would require a fair amount more understanding of wix and windows installer than I have, and it *probably* wouldn't be possible to be 100% correct about it either (there's nothing preventing a user from intentionally installing it in C:\, though I don't know why they would do so). If someone wants to tackle fixing existing installations, I think that the first installation is actually the only one that shows up in "Add or Remove Programs", and that its registry keys still exist. You might be able to find something under HKEY_USERS that lists both the "good" and the "bad" InstallDirs. Mine was under `HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-18\Software\Mercurial\InstallDir` (C:\), and `HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-..numbers..\Software\Mercurial\InstallDir` (C:\Program Files\Mercurial). If you find exactly two, with one being the default path, and the other being a prefix of it, the user almost certainly hit this bug :D We had originally thought that this bug might be due to unattended installations/upgrades, but I no longer think that's the case. We were able to reproduce the issue by uninstalling all copies of Mercurial I could find, installing one version (it chose the correct location), and then starting the installer for a different version (higher or lower didn't matter). I did not need to deal with an unattended or headless installation/upgrade to trigger the issue, but it's possible that my system was "primed" for this bug to happen because of a previous unattended installation/upgrade. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9891