Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:27:47 -0700 revlog: move revision verification out of verify
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:27:47 -0700] rev 39877
revlog: move revision verification out of verify File revision verification is performing low-level checks of file storage, namely that flags are appropriate and revision data can be resolved. Since these checks are somewhat revlog-specific and may not be appropriate for alternate storage backends, this commit moves those checks from verify.py to revlog.py. Because we're now emitting warnings/errors that apply to specific revisions, we taught the iverifyproblem interface to expose the problematic node and to report this node in verify output. This was necessary to prevent unwanted test changes. After this change, revlog.verifyintegrity() and file verify code in verify.py both iterate over revisions and resolve their fulltext. But they do so in separate loops. (verify.py needs to resolve fulltexts as part of calling renamed() - at least when using revlogs.) This should add overhead. But on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg verify before: time: real 700.640 secs (user 585.520+0.000 sys 23.480+0.000) after: time: real 682.380 secs (user 570.370+0.000 sys 22.240+0.000) I'm not sure what's going on. Maybe avoiding the filelog attribute proxies shaved off enough time to offset the losses? Maybe fulltext resolution has less overhead than I thought? I've left a comment indicating the potential for optimization. But because it doesn't produce a performance regression on a large repository, I'm not going to worry about it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4745
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:06:44 -0700 tests: de-flake test-narrow-debugrebuilddirstate.t
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:06:44 -0700] rev 39876
tests: de-flake test-narrow-debugrebuilddirstate.t If the dirstate gets written much later (usually 1-2 s, depending on FS) than the working copy file (there's only one), then the `hg debugdirstate` command will include a timestamp. There's nothing wrong with that, so we should just allow it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4758
Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:39:34 -0700 upgrade: use storageinfo() for obtaining storage metadata
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:39:34 -0700] rev 39875
upgrade: use storageinfo() for obtaining storage metadata Let's switch to our new API for obtaining information about storage. This eliminates the last consumer of rawsize() and the opener proxy from the file storage interface! Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4748
Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:56:48 -0700 revlog: add method for obtaining storage info (API)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:56:48 -0700] rev 39874
revlog: add method for obtaining storage info (API) We currently have a handful of methods on the file and manifest storage interfaces for obtaining metadata about storage. e.g. files() is used to obtain the files backing storage. rawsize() is to quickly compute the size of tracked revisions without resolving their fulltext. Code in upgrade and stream clone make heavy use of these methods. The existing APIs are generic and don't necessarily have the specialization that we need going forward. For example, files() doesn't distinguish between exclusive storage and shared storage. This makes stream clone difficult to implement when e.g. there may be a single file backing storage for multiple tracked paths. It also makes reporting difficult, as we don't know how many bytes are actually used by storage since we can't easily identify shared files. This commit implements a new method for obtaining storage metadata. It is designed to accept arguments specifying what metadata to request and to return a dict with those fields populated. We /could/ make each of these attributes a separate method. But this is a specialized API and I'm trying to avoid method bloat on the interfaces. There is also the possibility that certain callers will want to obtain multiple fields in different combinations and some backends may have performance issues obtaining all that data via separate method calls. Simple storage integration tests have been added. For now, we assume fields can't be "None" (ignoring the interface documentation). We can revisit this later. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4747
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:27:41 -0700 lfs: drop unused import
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:27:41 -0700] rev 39873
lfs: drop unused import A recent change dropped the last user of this module. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4744
Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:08:58 -0700 filelog: drop _generaldelta attribute (API)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:08:58 -0700] rev 39872
filelog: drop _generaldelta attribute (API) With changegroup moving to emitrevisions(), this revlog-specific attribute is no longer used and can be deleted. Good riddance. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4727
Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:59:19 -0700 revlog: drop emitrevisiondeltas() and associated functionality (API)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:59:19 -0700] rev 39871
revlog: drop emitrevisiondeltas() and associated functionality (API) emitrevisions() is the future! Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4726
Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:04 -0700 changegroup: port to emitrevisions() (issue5976)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:04 -0700] rev 39870
changegroup: port to emitrevisions() (issue5976) We now have a unified API for emitting revision data from a storage backend. It handles sorting nodes and the complicated delta versus revision decisions for us. This commit ports changegroup to that API. There should be no behavior changes for changegroups not using ellipsis. And lack of test changes seems to confirm that. There are some changes for ellipsis mode, however. Before, when sending an ellipsis revision, we would always send a fulltext revision (as opposed to a delta). There was a TODO tracking this open item. One of the things the emitrevisions() API does for us is figure out whether we can safely emit a delta. So, it is now possible for ellipsis revisions to be sent as deltas! (It does this by not assuming parent/ancestor revisions are available and tracking which revisions have been sent out.) Because we eliminated the list of revision delta request objects, performance has improved substantially: $ hg perfchangegroupchangelog before: ! wall 24.348077 comb 24.330000 user 24.140000 sys 0.190000 (best of 3) after: ! wall 18.245911 comb 18.240000 user 18.100000 sys 0.140000 (best of 3) That's a lot of overhead for creating a few hundred thousand Python objects! This is still a little slower than 4.7. Probably due to 23d582ca introducing a type for the revision/delta results. There is potentially room to optimize. But at some point we need to abstract storage in order to support alternate storage backends. Unfortunately that means using a Python data structure to represent results. And unfortunately there is overhead with every new Python object created. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4725
Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:48:02 -0700 wireprotov2server: port to emitrevisions()
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:48:02 -0700] rev 39869
wireprotov2server: port to emitrevisions() We now have a proper storage API to request data on multiple revisions. We can drop it into wire protocol version 2 with minimal effort. The new API handles pretty much everything we were doing manually to build up the delta request. So we were able to delete a lot of code. As a bonus, wireprotov2 code is no longer accessing some low-level storage APIs. This includes the assumption that a node has an associated numeric revision number! This should make it drastically simpler to implement a server that doesn't have the concept of revision numbers. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4724
Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:54:59 -0700 tests: use more complex file storage test
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:54:59 -0700] rev 39868
tests: use more complex file storage test The previous test was attempting to to test delta storage behavior. It didn't do a very good job at it because there was a good chance a delta wasn't being used in storage. Let's switch the test to yield a delta in storage so an upcoming change to delegate delta logic to storage has the desired effect. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4723
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip