wireproto: port protocol handler to zope.interface zope.interface is superior to the abc module. Let's port to it. As part of this, we add tests for interface conformance for classes implementing the interface. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2983

wireproto: separate commands tables for version 1 and 2 commands We can't easily reuse existing command handlers for version 2 commands because the response types will be different. e.g. many commands return nodes encoded as hex. Our new wire protocol is binary safe, so we'll wish to encode nodes as binary. We /could/ teach each command handler to look at the protocol handler and change behavior based on the version in use. However, this would make logic a bit unwieldy over time and would make it harder to design a unified protocol handler interface. I think it's better to create a clean break between version 1 and version 2 of commands on the server. What I imagine happening is we will have separate @wireprotocommand functions for each protocol generation. Those functions will parse the request, dispatch to a common function to process it, then generate the response in its own, transport-specific manner. This commit establishes a separate table for tracking version 1 commands from version 2 commands. The HTTP server pieces have been updated to use this new table. Most commands are marked as both version 1 and version 2, so there is little practical impact to this change. A side-effect of this change is we now rely on transport registration in wireprototypes.TRANSPORTS and certain properties of the protocol interface. So a test had to be updated to conform. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2982

wireproto: mark SSHv2 as a version 1 transport The version component is used for filtering/routing wire protocol commands to their proper handler. The actual version 2 of the wire protocol commands will use a different encoding of responses. We already have tests using the version 2 SSH transport and version 2 of the wire protocol commands won't be implemented atomically. This commit marks the SSHv2 transport as version 1 so it will still invoke the version 1 commands. Once the commands are all implemented in version 2, we can restore its proper behavior. Some tests had to be disabled as a result of this change. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2981

wireproto: stop aliasing wire protocol types (API) We generally shy away from aliasing module symbols. I think I was keeping this around for API compatibility. We've already made tons of other API breaks in the wire protocol code this release. What's one more? .. api:: ``wireproto`` module no longer re-exports various types used to define responses to wire protocol commands. Access these types from the ``wireprototypes`` module. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2979

wireproto: use CBOR for command requests Now that we're using CBOR in the new wire protocol, let's convert command requests to it. Before I wrote this patch and was even thinking about CBOR, I was thinking about how commands should be issued and came to the conclusion that we didn't need separate frames to represent the command name from its arguments. I already had a partially completed patch prepared to merge the frames. But with CBOR, it makes the implementation a bit simpler because we don't need to roll our own serialization. The changes here are a bit invasive. I tried to split this into multiple commits to make it easier to review. But it was just too hard. * "command name" and "command argument" frames have been collapsed into a "command request" frame. * The flags for this new frame are totally different. * Frame processing has been overhauled to reflect the new order of things. * Test fallout was significant. A handful of tests were removed. Altogether, I think the new code is simpler. We don't have complicated state around receiving commands. We're either receiving command request frames or command data frames. We /could/ potentially collapse command data frames into command request frames. Although I'd have to think a bit more about this before I do it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2951

wireproto: define frame to represent progress updates Today, a long-running operation on a server may run without any sign of progress on the client. This can lead to the conclusion that the server has hung or the connection has dropped. In fact, connections can and do time out due to inactivity. And a long-running server operation can result in the connection dropping prematurely because no data is being sent! While we're inventing the new wire protocol, let's provide a mechanism for communicating progress on potentially expensive server-side events. We introduce a new frame type that conveys "progress" updates. This frame type essentially holds the data required to formulate a ``ui.progress()`` call. We only define the frame right now. Implementing it will be a bit of work since there is no analog to progress frames in the existing wire protocol. We'll need to teach the ui object to write to the wire protocol, etc. The use of a CBOR map may seem wasteful, as this will encode key names in every frame. This *is* wasteful. However, maps are extensible. And the intent is to always use compression via streams. Compression will make the overhead negligible since repeated strings will be mostly eliminated over the wire. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2902