Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:07:59 -0500] rev 23672
tests: make a multi-statement hook in bundle2-exchange Windows compatible
This is similar to the fix in 7dd1870120b2.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:27:02 -0600] rev 23671
sshpeer: more thorough shell quoting
This fixes an issue spotted by Jesse Hertz.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:10:47 -0600] rev 23670
merge with stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:56 +0900] rev 23669
i18n-ja: synchronized with 3b84bde06d17
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@softwareexpress.com.br> [Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:21:08 -0200] rev 23668
i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with 53a65929ef1f
Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> [Tue, 23 Dec 2014 19:48:38 +0100] rev 23667
localrepo: use the vfs join method to implement the localrepo join method
This will make it possible to customize the behavior of the join method by
changing the vfs class (e.g. by using the altvfs" class introduced recently).
Note that we could have modified the VFS join methods to acept a set of optional
paths in the same way thta the localrepo join method does. However it seemed
simpler to simply call os.path.join before calling self.vfs.join.
Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> [Sun, 21 Dec 2014 00:19:10 +0100] rev 23666
localrepo: introduce shared method to check if a repository is shared
Up until now we compared the "path" and "sharedpath" repository properties to
check if a repository is shared. This was relying an implementation detail of
shared repositories. In order to make it possible to change the way shared
repositories are implemented, we encapsulate this check into its own localrepo
method, called shared.
This new method returns None if the repository is shared, and something else
(for now a string describing the short of share) otherwise.
The reason why I did not call this method "isshared" and made it return a
boolean is that I plan to introduce a new type of shared repository soon.
# NOTES:
This is the first patch in a series whose purpose is to add support for
creating "full repository shares", which are repositories that share everything
with the repository source except their current revision, branch and bookmark.
This series is RFC because I am not very sure of some of the solutions I took.
Comments are welcome!
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:16:26 -0800] rev 23665
trydiff: use 'ctx1.flags()' for symmetry with 'ctx2.flags()'
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:25:00 -0800] rev 23664
trydiff: use 'not in addedset' for symmetry with 'not in removedset'
With the previous change in place, we can safely use 'addedset'.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:12:54 -0800] rev 23663
trydiff: simplify checking for additions
In the body of the loop in trydiff(), there are conditions like:
addedset or (f in modifiedset and to is None)
The second half of that expression is to account for the fact that
merge-in additions appear as additions. By instead fixing up the sets
of modified and added files to compensate for this fact, we can
simplify the body of the loop. It also fixes one case where the
addedset was checked without the additional check (the "have we
already reported a copy above?" case in the code, also see fixed test
case).
The similar condition with 'removedset' in it seems to have served no
purpose even before this change, so it could have been simplified even
before.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:56:30 -0800] rev 23662
trydiff: extract 'date2' variable like existing 'date1'
Note that there is a comment saying "ctx2 date may be dynamic". The
comment was introduced in dccb83241dd0 (patch: use contexts for diff,
2006-12-25), but it seems like it stopped being dynamic in that very
changeset -- before that changeset, the date seems to have been the
file's mtime, but after the changeset, it seems to be the changeset's
timestamp (current time for workingctx). Since no one seems to have
missed the "dynamicness", let's simplify and extract a date2 for
symmetry with date1.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:41:45 -0800] rev 23661
trydiff: use sets, not lists, for containment checks
This only has a noticeable effect on diffs touching A LOT of
files. For example, it takes
hg diff -r FIREFOX_AURORA_30_BASE -r FIREFOX_AURORA_35_BASE
from 1m55.465s to 1m32.354s. That diff has over 50k files.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 24 Dec 2014 13:33:01 -0600] rev 23660
largefiles: fix unused import
Caught by pyflakes.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 07 Dec 2014 01:32:30 -0500] rev 23659
largefiles: look at unfiltered().lfstatus to allow status() to be filtered
The comment about status being buggy with a repo proxy seems to be that status
wasn't being redirected to testing the largefiles themselves- lfstatus was
always False, and so the original status method was being called instead of
doing the largefiles processing. This is because when the various largefile
command overrides call 'repo.lfstatus = True', __setattr__() in repoview is in
turn setting the value on the unfiltered repo, and the value in the filtered
repo remains False.
Explicitly looking at the attribute on the unfiltered repo keeps all views in
sync.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:21:02 -0500] rev 23658
largefiles: eliminate a duplicate message when removing files in verbose mode
There is no --after for addremove, so the printing for addremove can be hoisted
out of the 'not after' check. The difference between the two remove messages
reflects the existing difference between core remove and core addremove styles
for printing the file.
There are still some pre-existing issues here. Core addremove only prints on
inexact matches or when verbose. But since the largefiles that are being
removed are passed to removelargefiles() as a pattern list, there is never an
inexact match, which would keep the largefiles from being printed at all unless
verbose is specified. Therefore, the output is a little more aggressive than
core. The addremove print style here is also inconsistent with core- it should
use matcher.uipath(f) instead of f. These can be fixed once a matcher is passed
in.