Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:08:54 +0200 sslutil: make messages for Python without certificate handling more helpful
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:08:54 +0200] rev 14667
sslutil: make messages for Python without certificate handling more helpful We now explain why there is no certificate to verify and do not give hints about cacerts when they can't be used anyway.
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:03:03 +0200 sslutil: fall back to commonName when no dNSName in subjectAltName (issue2798)
Nicolas Bareil <nico@chdir.org> [Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:03:03 +0200] rev 14666
sslutil: fall back to commonName when no dNSName in subjectAltName (issue2798) Any entries in subjectAltName would prevent fallback to using commonName, but RFC 2818 says: If a subjectAltName extension of type dNSName is present, that MUST be used as the identity. Otherwise, the (most specific) Common Name field in the Subject field of the certificate MUST be used. We now only consider dNSNames in subjectAltName. (dNSName is known as 'DNS' in OpenSSL/Python.)
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -2 +2 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip