Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 17 Oct 2016 22:51:22 -0700] rev 30209
manifest: don't store None in fulltextcache
When we read a value from fulltextcache, we expect it to be an array,
so we should not store None in it. Found while working on narrowhg.
Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefanik@nng.com> [Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:09:08 +0200] rev 30208
copies: improve assertions during copy recombination
- Make sure there is nothing to recombine in non-graftlike scenarios
- More pythonic assert syntax
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:12:12 -0700] rev 30207
treemanifest: fix bad argument order to treemanifestctx
Found by running tests with _treeinmem (both of them) modified to be
True.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:10:21 -0700] rev 30206
wireproto: compress data from a generator
Currently, the "getbundle" wire protocol command obtains a generator of
data, converts it to a util.chunkbuffer, then converts it back to a
generator via the protocol's groupchunks() implementation. For the SSH
protocol, groupchunks() simply reads 4kb chunks then write()s the
data to a file descriptor. For the HTTP protocol, groupchunks() reads
32kb chunks, feeds those into a zlib compressor, emits compressed data
as it is available, and that is sent to the WSGI layer, where it is
likely turned into HTTP chunked transfer chunks as is or further
buffered and turned into a larger chunk.
For both the SSH and HTTP protocols, there is inefficiency from using
util.chunkbuffer.
For SSH, emitting consistent 4kb chunks sounds nice. However, the file
descriptor it is writing to is almost certainly buffered. That means
that a Python .write() probably doesn't translate into exactly what is
written to the I/O layer.
For HTTP, we're going through an intermediate layer to zlib compress
data. So all util.chunkbuffer is doing is ensuring that the chunks we
feed into the zlib compressor are of uniform size. This means more CPU
time in Python buffering and emitting chunks in util.chunkbuffer but
fewer function calls to zlib.
This patch introduces and implements a new wire protocol abstract
method: compresschunks(). It is like groupchunks() except it operates
on a generator instead of something with a .read(). The SSH
implementation simply proxies chunks. The HTTP implementation uses
zlib compression.
To avoid duplicate code, the HTTP groupchunks() has been reimplemented
in terms of compresschunks().
To prove this all works, the "getbundle" wire protocol command has been
switched to compresschunks(). This removes the util.chunkbuffer from
that command. Now, data essentially streams straight from the
changegroup emitter to the wire, possibly through a zlib compressor.
Generators all the way, baby.
There were slim to no performance changes on the server as measured
with the mozilla-central repository. This is likely because CPU
time is dominated by reading revlogs, producing the changegroup, and
zlib compressing the output stream. Still, this brings us a little
closer to our ideal of using generators everywhere.
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:48:36 +0200] rev 30205
revset: optimize for destination() being "inefficient"
destination() will scan through the whole subset and read extras for each
revision to get its source.
Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefanik@nng.com> [Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:39:47 +0200] rev 30204
copies: make _checkcopies handle copy sequences spanning the TCA (issue4028)
When working in a rotated DAG (for a graftlike merge), there can be files
that are renamed both between the base and the topological CA, and between
the TCA and the endpoint farther from the base. Such renames span the TCA
(and thus need both passes of _checkcopies to be fully detected), but may
not necessarily be divergent.
Make _checkcopies return "incomplete copies" and "incomplete divergences"
in this case, and let mergecopies recombine them once data from both passes
of _checkcopies is available.
With this patch, all known cases involving renames and grafts pass.
(Developed together with Pierre-Yves David)
Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefanik@nng.com> [Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:25:59 +0200] rev 30203
checkcopies: add logic to handle remotebase
As the two _checkcopies passes' ranges are separated by tca, not base,
only one of the two passes will actually encounter the base.
Pass "remotebase" to the other pass to let it know not to expect passing
over the base. This is required for handling a few unusual rename cases.
Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefanik@nng.com> [Tue, 04 Oct 2016 12:51:54 +0200] rev 30202
mergecopies: add logic to process incomplete data
We first combine incomplete copies on the two sides of the topological CA
into complete copies.
Any leftover incomplete copies are then combined with the incomplete
divergences to reconstruct divergences spanning over the topological CA.
Finally we promote any divergences falsely flagged as incomplete to full
divergences.
Right now, there is nothing generating incomplete copy/divergence data,
so this code does nothing. Changes to _checkcopies to populate these
dicts are coming later in this series.
Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefanik@nng.com> [Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:54:03 +0200] rev 30201
checkcopies: handle divergences contained entirely in tca::ctx
During a graftlike merge, _checkcopies runs from ctx to tca, possibly
passing over the merge base. If there is a rename both before and after
the base, then we're actually dealing with divergent renames.
If there is no rename on the other side of tca, then the divergence is
contained entirely in the range of one _checkcopies invocation, and
should be detected "in the loop" without having to rely on the other
_checkcopies pass.
Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefanik@nng.com> [Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:02:26 +0200] rev 30200
update: enable copy tracing for backwards and non-linear updates
As a followup to the issue4028 series, this fixes a variant of the issue
that can occur when updating with uncommited local changes.
The duplicated .hgsub warning is coming from wc.dirty(). We would previously
skip this call because it's only relevant when we're going to perform copy
tracing, which we didn't do before.
The change to the update summary line is because we now treat the rename as a
proper rename (which counts as a change), rather than an add+delete pair
(which counts as a change and a delete).