Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:17:11 -0400 run-tests: add support for xunit test reports
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:17:11 -0400] rev 22044
run-tests: add support for xunit test reports The Jenkins CI system understands xunit reports natively, so this will be helpful for anyone that wants to use Jenkins for testing hg or extensions that use run-tests.py for their testing.
Wed, 06 Aug 2014 02:45:55 -0500 contrib: add check-commit hook script to sanity-check commits
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 06 Aug 2014 02:45:55 -0500] rev 22043
contrib: add check-commit hook script to sanity-check commits
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:51:13 -0700 shelve: use `targetphase` while unbundling
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:51:13 -0700] rev 22042
shelve: use `targetphase` while unbundling This removes the last manual phase movement in shelve.
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:49:38 -0700 changegroup: add a `targetphase` argument to `addchangegroup`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:49:38 -0700] rev 22041
changegroup: add a `targetphase` argument to `addchangegroup` This argument controls the phase used for the added changesets. This can be useful to unbundle in "secret" phase as required by shelve. This change aims at helping high-level code get rid of manual phase movement. An important milestone for having phases part of the transaction.
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:37:45 -0700 shelve: do not retract phase boundary by hand
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:37:45 -0700] rev 22040
shelve: do not retract phase boundary by hand We rely on the internal mechanism to commit the changeset in the right state. This is similar to what the mq extension is doing. This is an important change as we plan to move phase movement with the transaction. Avoiding phase movement from high level code will avoid them the burden of transaction handling. It is also important to limit the need for transaction handling as this limits the odds of people messing up. Most common expected mess-up is to use a different transaction for changesets creation and phase adjustment.
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 18:53:05 -0700 commit: update the --secret code to use backupconfig and restoreconfig
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 18:53:05 -0700] rev 22039
commit: update the --secret code to use backupconfig and restoreconfig Those dedicated methods also preserve all associated data (eg: sources, lack of value).
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:22:44 -0700 rebase: do not retract phase boundary by hand
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:22:44 -0700] rev 22038
rebase: do not retract phase boundary by hand We rely on the internal mechanism to commit the changeset in the right phase. This similar to what the mq extension is doing. This is an important change as we plan to includes phase movement within the transaction. Avoiding phase movement from high-level code will avoid the burden of transaction handling. It is also important to limit the need for transaction handling as this limits the odds of people messing up. Most common expected mess-up is code using a different transaction for changeset creation and phase adjustment.
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:16:24 -0700 config: fix restoreconfig of non existing config
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:16:24 -0700] rev 22037
config: fix restoreconfig of non existing config When the section, but no value existed, the `del` call raised a key error.
Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:51:17 -0700 push: use stepsdone for obsmarkers push
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:51:17 -0700] rev 22036
push: use stepsdone for obsmarkers push We do not have infrastructure to include obsolescence markers in the bundle2 push from core. But extensions may so we make sure it would not be sent twice.
Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:32:20 +0200 push: introduce a discovery step for obsmarker
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:32:20 +0200] rev 22035
push: introduce a discovery step for obsmarker The discovery step is still not doing anything smart. But this will allow extension to wrap it.
Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:17:09 +0200 push: move the list of obsmarker to push into the push operation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:17:09 +0200] rev 22034
push: move the list of obsmarker to push into the push operation The list is now carried in the push operation, this will let extensions override it.
Fri, 04 Jul 2014 19:31:49 +0200 push: explicitly encode a list of obsmarkers to push
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 04 Jul 2014 19:31:49 +0200] rev 22033
push: explicitly encode a list of obsmarkers to push Sending obsmarkers through pushkey requires extra encoding (since pushkey can't take binary content) and slicing (since we can hit http header limit). As we send all obsolescences markers that exists in the repo for each push, we used to just look at the content of the "obsolete" pushkey namespace (already encoded and sliced) and send its content. However, future changeset will make it possible to push only parts of the obsmarkers. To prepare this we now explicitly encode a list of markers. The list of markers is still "all of them" but future changeset will takes care of that. The new code uses a "_protected" method but that seems reasonable to keep it private as this is the is the only external user of it and this whole pushing obsmarker through pushkey things in fairly hacky already)
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -12 +12 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip