Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:12:21 +0100 test-hardlink: stop explicitly listing `undo.dirstate`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:12:21 +0100] rev 50138
test-hardlink: stop explicitly listing `undo.dirstate` The files is on its way out.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 04:04:40 +0100 localrepo: enforce a clean dirstate when the transaction open
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 04:04:40 +0100] rev 50137
localrepo: enforce a clean dirstate when the transaction open This is important to simplify the backup process. This also seems like a quite reasonable expectation. See inline documentation for details.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:43:22 +0100 dirstate: explicitly backup the datafile
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:43:22 +0100] rev 50136
dirstate: explicitly backup the datafile Since the transaction does not know about this file, we need to explicitly mark it for backup before touching it.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 04:41:38 +0100 mq: write the dirstate before stripping
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 04:41:38 +0100] rev 50135
mq: write the dirstate before stripping I am not certain why it is dirty (probably the `repo.setparent` call a right before. However I know we need it flushed before the repository starts to be stripped.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 03:08:00 +0100 dirstate: simplify the shelve hack to not go through the disk
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 03:08:00 +0100] rev 50134
dirstate: simplify the shelve hack to not go through the disk We already have the data in memory, so why not simply keep the data in memory? This avoid abusing the `savebackup/restorebackup` logic and will make our life easier.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:44:07 +0100 dirstate: detect potential fishy transaction patterns while changing
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:44:07 +0100] rev 50133
dirstate: detect potential fishy transaction patterns while changing If we rely on the transaction more, we should be more careful about the transaction. Adding extra security seems reasonable.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:34:54 +0100 dirstate: generalize the dirstate's invalidation on transaction abort
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:34:54 +0100] rev 50132
dirstate: generalize the dirstate's invalidation on transaction abort The previous code was too specific, we should add the invalidation at next to the `addfilegenerator` in the `write` call.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:22:13 +0100 dirstate: simplify some methods' decorator
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:22:13 +0100] rev 50131
dirstate: simplify some methods' decorator Since `changing_parents` and `changing_files` are mutually exclusive, having both `@requires_changing_files` and `@requires_not_changing_parents` on a method is redundant.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:19:56 +0100 dirstate: document the functions that need consolidation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:19:56 +0100] rev 50130
dirstate: document the functions that need consolidation They are more functions that make the dirstate dirty but does not currently enforce a clean change scoping, we add comments in front of each of them so clarify this. There is no urgency to it, but the world will be a better place when all of them have proper scoping in place.
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:03:28 +0100 dirstate: make `restorebackup` more robust when it is a noop
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:03:28 +0100] rev 50129
dirstate: make `restorebackup` more robust when it is a noop If there are no data_file, we might not be able to determine its filename. Which can be safely ignored. (all this code is on the way out anyway)
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip