Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:00:41 +0100 peer: have a common constructor and use it
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:00:41 +0100] rev 49863
peer: have a common constructor and use it For now it does not do much, but we will extend it to also store a path object soon.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:04:51 +0100 peer: use a dedicated name for the `peer` constructor
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:04:51 +0100] rev 49862
peer: use a dedicated name for the `peer` constructor We want to change the argument it takes, so we rather make them different function.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:04:37 +0100 peer: dissolve `_peerlookup` into its last two callers
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:04:37 +0100] rev 49861
peer: dissolve `_peerlookup` into its last two callers This is about to need more changes and the function won't be useful. We do it early to clarify later changes.
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:45 +0100 peer: stop having a `peer()` method on `peer()`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:45 +0100] rev 49860
peer: stop having a `peer()` method on `peer()` This is already a peer, why do you want a peer if you already have one.
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:39 +0100 clone: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:39 +0100] rev 49859
clone: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer Instead of having `peer()` method on all `peer()` for this usecase, we could simply handle it explicitly.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 19:15:04 +0100 addbranchrevs: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 19:15:04 +0100] rev 49858
addbranchrevs: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer Instead of having `peer()` method on all `peer()` for this usecase, we could simply handle it explicitly.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:01:54 +0100 path: pass `path` to `peer` in `hg clone`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:01:54 +0100] rev 49857
path: pass `path` to `peer` in `hg clone` We directly use the `path` object to build the `peer` object.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:49:54 +0100 path: use `get_clone_path_obj` in share
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:49:54 +0100] rev 49856
path: use `get_clone_path_obj` in share The return is simpler to use, and this mean less user for the old function. We directly use the `path` object to build the `peer` object.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:42:36 +0100 path: pass `path` to `peer` in mq
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:42:36 +0100] rev 49855
path: pass `path` to `peer` in mq We directly use the `path` object to build the `peer` object. There is one case where we don't. We should fix that at the same time as we fix the sub-repo cases.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:36:43 +0100 path: use `get_clone_path_obj` in _getlocal
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:36:43 +0100] rev 49854
path: use `get_clone_path_obj` in _getlocal We don't need to feed the `path` object to a `peer` object, but using an higher level function is simpler here (e.g. no subscript access, explicit attribute access).
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip