Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:43:00 -0800] rev 41224
context: use scmutil.matchfiles instead of matchmod.match(exact=True)
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5591
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:19:43 -0500] rev 41223
histedit: fix call to _getgoal() by adding a byteskwargs() wrapper
I also added some b-prefixes while I was here because I got confused
and it seems silly to not just add them since it clarifies the whole
change.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5585
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:41:21 +0100] rev 41222
revset: introduce an API that avoids `formatspec` input serialization
Instead of having the data fully serialized, the input can be directly inserted
in the tree at a later stage.
Just using it for simple "%ld" case provide a significant boost. For example
here are the impact on a sample discovery run between two pypy repositories
with arbitrary differences (using hg perfdiscovery).
$ hg perfdiscovery
before: ! wall 0.700435 comb 0.710000 user 0.700000 sys 0.010000 (median of 15)
after: ! wall 0.501305 comb 0.510000 user 0.490000 sys 0.020000 (median of 20)
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 04 Jan 2019 05:26:13 +0100] rev 41221
revset: detect integer list on parsing
Right now, using "%ld" with `repo.revs("…%ld…", somerevs)` is very
inefficient, all items in `somerevs` will be serialized to ascii and then
reparsed as integers. If `somerevs` contains just an handful of entry this is
fine, however, when you get to thousands or hundreds of thousands of revisions
this becomes very slow.
To avoid this serialization we need to first detect this situation. The code
involved in the whole process is quite complex so we start simple and focus on
some "simple" but widespread cases.
So far we only detect the situation and don't do anything special about it.
The singled out will be serialized in `formatspec` in the same way as before.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 04 Jan 2019 05:16:57 +0100] rev 41220
revert: extract "%ld" formatting in a _formatintlist function
We'll have to reuse this logic in different places.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 04 Jan 2019 02:29:04 +0100] rev 41219
revset: extract parsing logic out of formatspec
We want to be able to perform better handling of some input when running
revset (eg: `repo.revs("%ld", somerevs)`). The first step is to be able to
access some of the parsed content before it gets substituted. There are many
possible different substitutions, we'll add support for them gradually.
In this changeset we support none, we just split some logic in a sub function
as a preparatory step.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:23:58 +0100] rev 41218
revset: enforce "%d" to be interpreted as literal revision number (API) (BC)
Before this change, `formatspec("%d", x)` results in `"%d" % int(x)`. This
seems simple and correct until you consider `nullrev`. In revset, a direct
"-1" symbol is equivalent to `tip` not `nullrev`. This is a subtle error that
went undetected for a while. Wrapping the revision number inside 'rev()'
remove the ambiguity, preserving nullrev value passed to formatspec.
It got caught by the rebase code, were the following wrongly returned `[1]`:
repo.revs("children(%d) and ancestors(%ld)", 0, [nullrev])
This is flagged as API, because `%d` can be used for non-revision integer
argument of revset function. We probably need to introduce a new '%…'
substitution to allow literal integer (maybe `%i`). However, the `%d` usage is
currently widespread for revision number so it is important to fix this issue
for `%d`. This choice is reinforced by the fact _intlist is implemented as
revisions only. Restricting `%d` to revision only makes things more
consistent.
This bug can become especially tricky since `_intlist` recognize `nullrev`
right. So `revs('%ld', [-1, 0])` → select `[nullrev, 0]` but `revs('%ld',
[-1])` is simplified and treated as `%d` selecting `[tip]`.
Another side effect is that "%d" of an unknown revision simply match nothing. It
was previously raising and error. This is consistent with what "%ld" (and
`_intlist`) is doing, so it seems like a good move.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:03:07 +0100] rev 41217
revset: remove the last usage of "%d" for a non-revision entry
In order to fix an important bug, we are about to narrow the semantic of "%d"
in revset. This is one of the few exceptions that we need to get rid of before
being able to fix the bug.
See the later semantic narrowing changeset for full rationale on the semantic
change.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:57:13 +0100] rev 41216
revset: remove a rare usage of "%d" for a non-revision item
In order to fix an important bug, we are about to narrow the semantic of "%d"
in revset. This is one of the few exceptions that we need to get rid of before
being able to fix the bug.
See the later semantic narrowing changeset for full rationale on the semantic
change.
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:45:48 -0500] rev 41215
merge with stable