Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:02:49 +0200 rawdata: register the method for `ifiledata`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:02:49 +0200] rev 42744
rawdata: register the method for `ifiledata` The interface have a `revision(..., raw=False)` method so it should get a `rawdata` one. I am not sure why nothing complained about the lack of it earlier.
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 21:17:48 +0200 rawdata: implement the method for `unionrepo` too
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 21:17:48 +0200] rev 42743
rawdata: implement the method for `unionrepo` too This is required for all implementations.
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:51:52 +0200 rawdata: implement the method for `remotefilelog` too
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:51:52 +0200] rev 42742
rawdata: implement the method for `remotefilelog` too This is needed for all storage implementations.
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:48:05 +0200 rawdata: implement `rawdata` for `simplestore` too
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:48:05 +0200] rev 42741
rawdata: implement `rawdata` for `simplestore` too This is needed for all implementation.
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:08:04 +0200 rawdata: forward `rawdata` call on `manifestlog`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:08:04 +0200] rev 42740
rawdata: forward `rawdata` call on `manifestlog` This needs to be sent to the underlying `revlog` too.
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:01:52 +0200 rawdata: implement `rawdata` for `sqlitestore` too
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:01:52 +0200] rev 42739
rawdata: implement `rawdata` for `sqlitestore` too This is a different store, it needs it declared.
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:00:57 +0200 rawdata: add the method to bundlerevlog
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:00:57 +0200] rev 42738
rawdata: add the method to bundlerevlog The bundlerepo logic has its own `revision` method on its own `revlog` object. We need to "implement" `rawdata` there too.
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 21:59:20 +0200 rawdata: forward the method call on `filelog` object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 21:59:20 +0200] rev 42737
rawdata: forward the method call on `filelog` object We have a new method, we need to expose it.
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 21:54:29 +0200 rawdata: introduce a `rawdata` method on revlog
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 21:54:29 +0200] rev 42736
rawdata: introduce a `rawdata` method on revlog This method aims at replacing `revision(..., raw=True)` call. The purpose of data returned without and without raw are different enough that having two different method would make sense. This split is motivated by other work aiming at storing data on the side of the main revision of a revlog. Having a cleaner API makes it simpler to add this work. The series following this first changesets is organised as follow: 1) add `rawdata` method everywhere it is useful 2) update all caller 3) implement all `rawdata` method without using `revision` 4) deprecate the `rawdata` parameter of `revision`
Wed, 07 Aug 2019 17:14:48 +0200 revlog: split a `_revisiondata` method to file `revision` job
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 07 Aug 2019 17:14:48 +0200] rev 42735
revlog: split a `_revisiondata` method to file `revision` job We are about to introduce more public method to access revision data (eg: `rawdata`). revset subclass tend to recursively call `revision` which will create all kind of issue with the coming series. To avoid them we introduce an explicit difference between the internal call and the public all. This will be useful for later work anyway (so the subclass issue is just moving it earlier in the series). I am not sure if the subclass are actually doing something sensible. However, I am certain I don't want to be rabbit holed into figuring it out right now.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip