histedit: Speed up scrolling in patch view mode Store patchcontents into the mode state, avoiding the expensive call to ui for computing the patchcontents. Before this change in large repos histedit patch view mode can be very irresponsive.

histedit: Show file names in multiple line format

repoview: introduce a `experimental.extra-filter-revs` config The option define revisions to additionally filter out of all repository "view". The end goal is to provide and easy to way to serve multiple subset of the same repository using multiple "shares". The simplest use case of this feature is to have one view serving the public changesets and one view also serving the draft. This is currently achievable using the new `server.view` option introduced recently by Joerg Sonnenberger. However, more advanced use cases need more advanced definitions. For example some needs a view dedicated to some release branches, or view that hides security fixes to be released. Joerg Sonnenberger and I discussed this topic at the recent mini-sprint and the both of us have seen real life use cases for this. (This series got written during the same mini-sprint). The feature is fully functional, and use similar cache-fallback mechanism to ensure decent performance. However,there remaining room to ensure each share caches and hooks collaborate with each others. This will come at a later time once users start to actually test this feature on real usecase.

copies: filter out copies from non-existent source later in _chain() _changesetforwardcopies() repeatedly calls _chain(). That is very expensive because _chain() does lookups in the manifest. I hope to split up the function in two parts: 1) simple chaining, not considering end points, and 2) filter out files that don't exist in the end points (and ping-pong copies/renames). This patches gets us closer to that by moving the check for non-existent source later in the function. Now there are no more checks for "src" and "dst" in the first loop; all the filtering of invalid copies is done in the second loop. The code also looks much more consistent now. No measureable impact on `hg debugpathcopies 4.0 4.8`. That shouldn't be surprising since the only case we're doing more checks now is in case of chained copies/renames, which are quire rare in practice. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6277

copies: clarify mutually exclusive cases in _chain() with a s/if/elif/ If the 'b' dict has a rename from 'x' to 'y', it shouldn't be possible for 'x' to be both (a key) in 'a' and in 'src'. That would mean that 'x' is a file in the source commit and also a rename destination in the intermediate commit. But we currently don't allow renaming files onto existing files, so that shouldn't happen. So let's clarify that by using an "elif" instead of an "if". And if we did allow renaming files onto existing files, we should prefer to use the rename destination in the intermediate commit as source anyway. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6276

copies: delete a redundant cleanup step in _chain() The check is redundant since d5edb5d3a337 (copies: filter out copies when target is not in destination manifest, 2019-02-14). To test that hypothesis, I made this change in the commit that commit, but all tests still passed. I think the case was necessary before then, we just didn't have tests for it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6275

copies: document cases in _chain() Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6274

copies: ignore heuristics copytracing when using changeset-centric algos Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6269

copies: move check for experimental.copytrace==<falsy> earlier I'm going to ignore experimental.copytrace when changeset-centric algorithms are required. This little refactoring makes that easier to add. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6268

copies: replace .items() by .values() where appropriate As pointed out by Pierre-Yves. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6266

copies: inline _computenonoverlap() in mergecopies() We now call pathcopies() from the base to each of the commits, and that calls _computeforwardmissing(), which does file prefetching (in the remotefilelog override). So the call to _computenonoverlap() is now pointless (the sets of files from _computenonoverlap() are subsets of the sets of files from _computeforwardmissing()). This somehow also fixes a broken remotefilelog test. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6256

copies: calculate mergecopies() based on pathcopies() When copies are stored in changesets, we need a changeset-centric version of mergecopies() just like we have a changeset-centric version of pathcopies(). I think the natural way of thinking about mergecopies() is in terms of pathcopies() from the base to each of the commits. So if we can rewrite mergecopies() based on two such pathcopies() calls, we'll get the changeset-centric version for free. That's what this patch does. A nice bonus is that it ends up being a lot simpler. mergecopies() has accumulated a lot of technical debt over time. One good example is the code for dealing with grafts (the "partial/incomplete/dirty" stuff). Since pathcopies() already deals with backwards renames and ping-pong renames, we get that for free. I've run tests with hard-coded debug logging for "fullcopy" and while I haven't looked at every difference it produces, all the ones I have looked at seemed reasonable to me. I'm a little surprised that no more tests fail when run with '--extra-config-opt experimental.copies.read-from=compatibility' compared to before this patch. This patch also fixes the broken cases in test-annotate.t and test-fastannotate.t. It also enables the part of test-copies.t that was previously disabled exactly because mergecopies() needed to get a changeset-centric version. One drawback of the rewritten code is that we may now make remotefilelog prefetch more files. We used to prefetch files that were unique to either side of the merge compared to the other. We now prefetch files that are unique to either side of the merge compared to the base. This means that if you added the same file to each side, we would not prefetch it before, but we would now. Such cases are probably quite rare, but one likely scenario where they happen is when moving from a commit to its successor (or the other way around). The user will probably already have the files in the cache in such cases, so it's probably not a big deal. Some timings for calculating mergecopies between two revisions (revisions shown on each line, all using the common ancestor as base): In the hg repo: 4.8 4.9: 0.21s -> 0.21s 4.0 4.8: 0.35s -> 0.63s In and old copy of the mozilla-unified repo: FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE^ FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE: 0.82s -> 0.82s FIREFOX_NIGHTLY_59_END FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE: 2.5s -> 2.6s FIREFOX_BETA_59_END FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE: 3.9s -> 4.1s FIREFOX_AURORA_50_BASE FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE: 31s -> 33s So it's measurably slower in most cases. The most significant difference is in the hg repo between revisions 4.0 and 4.8. In that case it seems to come from the fact that pathcopies() uses fctx.isintroducedafter() (in _tracefile), while the old mergecopies() used fctx.linkrev() (in _checkcopies()). That results in a single call to filectx._adjustlinkrev(), which is responsible for the entire difference in time (in my repo). So we pay a performance penalty but we get more correct code (see change in test-mv-cp-st-diff.t). Deleting the "== f.filenode()" in _tracefile() recovers the lost performance in the hg repo. There were are few other optimizations in _checkcopies() that I could not measure any impact from. One was from the "seen" set. Another was from a "continue" when the file was not in the destination manifest (corresponding to "am" in _tracefile). Also note that merge copies are not calculated when updating with a clean working copy, which is probably the most common case. I therefore think the much simpler code is worth the slowdown. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6255

tests: add test where copy source is deleted and added back This shows another difference between pathcopies() and mergecopies(): mergecopies() considers files that have been deleted and then added back as different files, but pathcopies() does not. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6330

merge with stable

obsolete: drop the legacy `_enabled` variable Evolve 8.5.0 stopped setting this, and it would have been easier to figure out why TortoiseHg stopped allowing amends if it would have crashed on the missing variable.

discovery: only calculate closed branches if required The number of new closed branches is required for printing in error message. So let's only calculate them if we need to print error about new branches. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6314

branchcache: store the maximum tip in a variable inside for loop Instead of assigning self.tiprev multiple times in the for loop, and calling cl.node() on it, let's store that in a temporary variable and assign it in the end of loop. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6311

tests: demonstrate that rename is followed to wrong parent from merge This test case shows another way that copies are handled differently between `hg st` (pathcopies()) and `hg co -m` (mergecopies). The reason is that pathcopies() calls _tracefiles(), which checks that the file nodeid of an ancestor matches the file nodeid in the base commit. mergecopies() should probably be doing the same. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6323

test: demonstrate failure to follow rename with shadowed linkrev This shows a difference in handling of copies between `hg st` (pathcopies()) and `hg co -m`. The issue here is that mergecopies() uses the unadjusted linkrev() for determining when to stop walking ancestors. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6322

tests: slightly modify a linkrev test to prepare for expanding it The test case checks that the copy tracing code doesn't get confused by linkrevs when walking a file's ancestors. This patch chnages the test slightly so a second commit is grafted, thus producing a second "bad" linkrev. I'll use this in the next patch to demonstrate a bug. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6321

copies: process files in deterministic order for stable tests I also fixed a typo while at it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6320

py3: properly reject non-encoded strings given to hgweb

py3: handle meta-path finders that only use pre-python3.4 API

remotefilelog: add missing argument to hg.verify wrapper Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6313

revsetbenchmark: track some simple use of "only" The only revset is quite useful and has various possible optimisation. tracking its timing seems useful.

push: added clear warning message when pushing closed branches(issue6080) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6038

branch: abort if closing branch from a non-branchhead cset This patch make sure that we abort if the user is trying to close a branch from a cset which is not a branch head. Changes in test file reflect the fixed behaviour. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6282

branch: add tests which shows branch can be closed from a non-branchhead cset This patch shows that we can close a branch even from a cset which is not a branch head. It was supposed to abort this operation. Next patch will be fixing the issue. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6281

phabricator: read more metadata from local:commits local:commits metadata can contain branch info, and 'rev' has been superseded by 'commit', see: https://github.com/phacility/arcanist/blob/83661809e532c3fe444a8bf7c7d6936e6377691b/src/repository/api/ArcanistMercurialAPI.php#L281 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6300

phabricator: don't assume the existence of properties of local:commits Not all the properties are guaranteed to be there, so if we don't check first we could die with a KeyError. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6299