Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:28:54 +0200 docs: don't use :hg: at the beginning of lines in notes (issue3397) stable
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:28:54 +0200] rev 16510
docs: don't use :hg: at the beginning of lines in notes (issue3397) It seem like docutils 0.8 interpret ':hg:`command`' roles at the beginning of indented lines in '.. note::' directives as a field that is an invalid argument to the directive. It fails with 'Error in "note" directive: invalid option block.' Docutils 0.7 accepted this arguably incorrect markup. Reflowing the text makes the problem go away. A leading '\ ' could perhaps also be used to mask the problem.
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:06:36 +0200 rebase: skip resolved but emptied revisions stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:06:36 +0200] rev 16509
rebase: skip resolved but emptied revisions When rebasing, if a conflict occurs and is resolved in a way the rebased revision becomes empty, it is not skipped, unlike revisions being emptied without conflicts. The reason is: - File 'x' is merged and resolved, merge.update() marks it as 'm' in the dirstate. - rebase.concludenode() calls localrepo.commit(), which calls localrepo.status() which calls dirstate.status(). 'x' shows up as 'm' and is unconditionnally added to the modified files list, instead of being checked again. - localrepo.commit() detects 'x' as changed an create a new revision where only the manifest parents and linkrev differ. Marking 'x' as modified without checking it makes sense for regular merges. But in rebase case, the merge looks normal but the second parent is usually discarded. When this happens, 'm' files in dirstate are a bit irrelevant and should be considered 'n' possibly dirty instead. That is what the current patch does. Another approach, maybe more efficient, would be to pass another flag to merge.update() saying the 'branchmerge' is a bit of a lie and recordupdate() should call dirstate.normallookup() instead of merge(). It is also tempting to add this logic to dirstate.setparents(), moving from two to one parent is what invalidates the 'm' markers. But this is a far bigger change to make. v2: succumb to the temptation and move the logic in dirstate.setparents(). mpm suggested trying _filecommit() first but it is called by commitctx() which knows nothing about the dirstate and comes too late into the game. A second approach was to rewrite the 'm' state into 'n' on the fly in dirstate.status() which failed for graft in the following case: $ hg init repo $ cd repo $ echo a > a $ hg ci -qAm0 $ echo a >> a $ hg ci -m1 $ hg up 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg mv a b $ echo c > b $ hg ci -m2 created new head $ hg graft 1 --tool internal:local grafting revision 1 $ hg --config extensions.graphlog= glog --template '{rev} {desc|firstline}\n' @ 3 1 | o 2 2 | | o 1 1 |/ o 0 0 $ hg log -r 3 --debug --patch --git --copies changeset: 3:19cd7d1417952af13161b94c32e901769104560c tag: tip phase: draft parent: 2:b5c505595c9e9a12d5dd457919c143e05fc16fb8 parent: -1:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 manifest: 3:3d27ce8d02241aa59b60804805edf103c5c0cda4 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 extra: branch=default extra: source=a03df74c41413a75c0a42997fc36c2de97b26658 description: 1 Here, revision 3 is created because there is a copy record for 'b' in the dirstate and thus 'b' is considered modified. But this information is discarded at commit time since 'b' content is unchanged. I do not know if discarding this information is correct or not, but at this time we cannot represent it anyway. This patch therefore implements the last solution of moving the logic into dirstate.setparents(). It does not sound crazy as 'm' files makes no sense with only one parent. It also makes dirstate.merge() calls .lookupnormal() if there is one parent, to preserve the invariant. I am a bit concerned about introducing this kind of stateful behaviour to existing code which historically treated setparents() as a basic setter without side-effects. And doing that during the code freeze.
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:27:50 +0200 test-rebase: exhibit revisions which should have been skipped stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:27:50 +0200] rev 16508
test-rebase: exhibit revisions which should have been skipped This will be fixed in the next commit. v2: - Display emptied grafted revisions - Use --git flag
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:40:38 +0200 transplant: do not rollback on patching error (issue3379) stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:40:38 +0200] rev 16507
transplant: do not rollback on patching error (issue3379) Otherwise, all transplanted revisions are gone and the failing one cannot be fixed (unless it is the first one). I do not know what is the expected behaviour with rollback, probably something pull-like. Non-conflicting cases should work as previously. But something like: $ hg transplant r1 r2 commiting r1 as c1 failing r2 $ hg transplant --continue committing r2 as c2 $ hg rollback would reset the repository to its state before the "transplant --continue" instead of the whole transplant session. To fix this we might need a way to open an existing journal file, not sure this is worth the pain.
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:40:25 +0200 patch: fix patch hunk/metdata synchronization (issue3384) stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:40:25 +0200] rev 16506
patch: fix patch hunk/metdata synchronization (issue3384) Git patches are parsed in two phases: 1) extract metadata, 2) parse actual deltas and merge them with the previous metadata. We do this to avoid dependency issues like "modify a; copy a to b", where "b" must be copied from the unmodified "a". Issue3384 is caused by flaky code I wrote to synchronize the patch metadata with the emitted hunk: if (gitpatches and (gitpatches[-1][0] == afile or gitpatches[-1][1] == bfile)): gp = gitpatches.pop()[2] With a patch like: diff --git a/a b/c copy from a copy to c --- a/a +++ b/c @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@ a +a @@ -2,1 +2,2 @@ a +a diff --git a/a b/a --- a/a +++ b/a @@ -1,1 +1,2 @@ a +b the first hunk of the first block is matched with the metadata for the block "diff --git a/a b/c", then the second hunk of the first block is matched with the metadata of the second block "diff --git a/a b/a", because of the "or" in the code paste above. Turning the "or" into an "and" is not enough as we have to deal with /dev/null cases for each file. We I remove this broken piece of code: # copy/rename + modify should modify target, not source if gp.op in ('COPY', 'DELETE', 'RENAME', 'ADD') or gp.mode: afile = bfile because "afile = bfile" set "afile" to stuff like "b/file" instead of "a/file", and because this only happens for git patches, which afile/bfile are ignored anyway by applydiff(). v2: - Avoid a traceback on git metadata desynchronization
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:23:47 +0200 commit: use ui.configbool when checking 'commitsubrepos' setting on --amend stable
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:23:47 +0200] rev 16505
commit: use ui.configbool when checking 'commitsubrepos' setting on --amend Before this fix, having [ui] commitsubrepos = False in the config file lead to $ hg ci --amend -mx abort: cannot amend recursively
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:38:22 +0900 doc: add note about pattern rooted/unrooted cases to "hgignore" and "patterns" stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:38:22 +0900] rev 16504
doc: add note about pattern rooted/unrooted cases to "hgignore" and "patterns" each help topics describe that patterns are "not rooted" and "rooted" in themselves, but not describe about each other. so, this may causes misunderstanding about "rooted"-ness of patterns.
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:33:09 +0900 doc: add description about location of management files for subrepo stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:33:09 +0900] rev 16503
doc: add description about location of management files for subrepo
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:33:09 +0900 doc: add description about re-opening closed heads to 'Head, closed branch' in glossary stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:33:09 +0900] rev 16502
doc: add description about re-opening closed heads to 'Head, closed branch' in glossary
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:33:09 +0900 doc: fix careless document miss for term 'Close changeset' in glossary stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:33:09 +0900] rev 16501
doc: fix careless document miss for term 'Close changeset' in glossary there is no term 'Changeset, close' in glossary. 'Close changeset' seems to have to be linked not to 'Branch, closed', but to 'Head, closed branch', because only the latter explains about "the changeset that marks a head as no longer interesting".
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip