Mon, 03 Dec 2018 21:31:19 +0900 selectors2: backport minimal fix of timeout handling from 2.0.1 stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Dec 2018 21:31:19 +0900] rev 40449
selectors2: backport minimal fix of timeout handling from 2.0.1 The original code would raise TypeError since OSError() doesn't support keyword arguments. We can't simply import the selectors 2.0.1, which still spawns "uname -p" through platform.system(). We could switch to the unreleased version, but I decided to not right now to minimize the change.
Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:12:43 -0500 tests: sniff for libfuzzer actually being available in test-fuzz-targets.t stable
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:12:43 -0500] rev 40448
tests: sniff for libfuzzer actually being available in test-fuzz-targets.t When I upgraded the FreeBSD buildbot to 11.2 it seems we picked up clang6, but the default clang on FreeBSD doesn't include libfuzzer. I can't find a way to sniff for libfuzzer without running a compile, so here we are. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5270
Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:11:37 -0500 tests: sniff for /usr/local/bin/gmake and use it in test-fuzz-targets.t stable
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:11:37 -0500] rev 40447
tests: sniff for /usr/local/bin/gmake and use it in test-fuzz-targets.t This isn't as robust as it probably should be, but for now it'll get the job done on the buildbots. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5269
Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:25:37 -0500 tests: stabilize test-inherit-mode.t on FreeBSD and macOS (issue6026) stable
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:25:37 -0500] rev 40446
tests: stabilize test-inherit-mode.t on FreeBSD and macOS (issue6026) Symbolic links are funny permissions-wise, but on the linked issue Yuya has convinced me that we can ignore this permissions issue on macOS (FreeBSD allows setting permissions bits but ignores them) and we'll be in fine shape.
Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:52:23 -0800 wireprotov2peer: wait for initial object before resolving future stable
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:52:23 -0800] rev 40445
wireprotov2peer: wait for initial object before resolving future As part of rolling out wireprotov2 with redirect support, I encountered an edge case with regards to future resolution. Essentially, the initial response frame from the server did not fully decode the initial CBOR object. The frame wasn't marked as EOS. In the previous code, we resolved the future for the request to response.objects(), which mapped to the commandresponse instance which would eventually produce a redirect. Upon receiving subsequent data, the initial CBOR object containing the redirect would be decoded and we'd process the redirect. However, the future would already have been resolved with the initial commandresponse.objects() and the client iterating over the objects wouldn't receive any objects from the redirect because the redirect was populating a different commandresponse instance! This commit changes the logic so we don't resolve futures until the initial CBOR response object is fully decoded or until EOS occurs. In cases where there is an empty or partial frame associated with a redirect, the future will now resolve with the commandresponse containing the proper series of decoded objects.
Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:37:43 -0800 wireprotov2peer: always return a bool from _processredirect() stable
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:37:43 -0800] rev 40444
wireprotov2peer: always return a bool from _processredirect() Without this, we may stop servicing the redirect response if the future has already been resolved. And the future will often be resolved very early, since many consumers iterate the decoded CBOR object stream and expect data to lazily arrive.
Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:47:19 -0500 tests: stabilize the recent checkexec changes on Windows stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:47:19 -0500] rev 40443
tests: stabilize the recent checkexec changes on Windows This goes with bd0874977a5e.
Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:09:23 +0100 checkexec: create destination directory if necessary stable
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:09:23 +0100] rev 40442
checkexec: create destination directory if necessary Since 460733327640, a "share" use the cache of the source repository. A side effect is that no `.hg/cache` directory exists in the "share" anymore. As a result, the checkexec logic can't use it to create its temporary file and have to use the working copy for that. This is suboptimal, it pollutes the working copy and prevents them to keep the file around in cache. We do not want to use the cache directory for the share target, it might be on a different file system. So instead, we (try to) create the directory if it is missing. This is a simple change that fixes the current behavior regression on stable. On default, we should probably ensure the proper directories are created when initializing the repository. We should also introduce a 'wcache' directory to hold cache file related to the working copy. This would clarify the cache situation regarding shares. The tests catch a couple of other affected cases.
Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:59:38 +0900 graft: do not try to skip rev derived from ancestor more than once (issue6024) stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:59:38 +0900] rev 40441
graft: do not try to skip rev derived from ancestor more than once (issue6024) We check 'x in revs' in other cases, so let's do the same. The test case credits to Tom Prince.
Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:37:26 -0500 subrepo: print the status line before creating the peer for better diagnostics stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:37:26 -0500] rev 40440
subrepo: print the status line before creating the peer for better diagnostics I ran into a problem where I tried updating to a different branch, and the process appeared to hang. It turned out that the subrepo revision wasn't available locally, and I must have originally cloned it from an `hg serve -S` on a machine that currently wasn't serving anything. It took 2+ minutes to timeout, and didn't mention what it was connecting to even then. There are a couple of other issues in this scenario too. - The repo is dirty after the failed checkout because the top level repo is updated first. We should probably make 2 passes- top down to pull everything needed, and then do an update once everything is in place. - Something must be reading .hgsubstate from wdir because if the same merge command is run after the timeout, a prompt is issued that the local and remote subrepo diverged, instead of hanging. But it lists the local version and remote version as having the same hash.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip