Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:42:28 -0800] rev 28113
verify: include "manifest" prefix in a few more places
We include the "manifest" prefix on most other errors, so it seems
consistent to add them to the remaining messages too. Also, having the
"manifest" prefix will be more consistent with having the directory
prefix there when we add support for treemanifests. With the
"manifest" at the beginning, let's remove the now-redundant
"manifest" in the message itself.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:46:14 -0800] rev 28112
verify: drop unnecessary check for nullid
In eb914541a950 (verify: filter messages about missing null manifests
(issue2900), 2011-07-13), we started ignoring nullid in the list of
manifest nodeids to check. Then, in b32a30da608d (verify: do not choke
on valid changelog without manifest, 2012-08-21), we stopped adding
nullid to the list to start with. So let's drop the left-over check
now.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:10:56 -0800] rev 28111
verify: move cross-checking of changeset/manifest out of _crosscheckfiles()
Reasons:
* _crosscheckfiles(), as the name suggests, is about checking that
the set of files files mentioned in changesets match the set of
files mentioned in the manifests.
* The "checking" in _crosscheckfiles() looked rather strange, as it
just emitted an error for *every* entry in mflinkrevs. The reason
was that these were the entries remaining after the call to
_verifymanifest(). Moving all the processing of mflinkrevs into
_verifymanifest() makes it much clearer that it's the remaining
entries that are a problem.
Functional change: progress is no longer reported for "crosschecking"
of missing manifest entries. Since the crosschecking phase takes a
tiny fraction of the verification, I don't think this is a
problem. Also, any reports of "changeset refers to unknown manifest"
will now come before "crosschecking files in changesets and
manifests".