Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700 stdio: raise StdioError if something goes wrong in ui._write
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700] rev 31961
stdio: raise StdioError if something goes wrong in ui._write
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700 stdio: catch StdioError in dispatch.run and clean up appropriately
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700] rev 31960
stdio: catch StdioError in dispatch.run and clean up appropriately We attempt to report what went wrong, and more importantly exit the program with an error code. (The exception we catch is not yet raised anywhere in the code.)
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700 stdio: add machinery to identify failed stdout/stderr writes
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700] rev 31959
stdio: add machinery to identify failed stdout/stderr writes Mercurial currently fails to notice failures to write to stdout or stderr. A correctly functioning command line tool should detect this and exit with an error code. To achieve this, we need a little extra plumbing, which we start adding here.
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700 atexit: switch to home-grown implementation
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700] rev 31958
atexit: switch to home-grown implementation
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700 atexit: test failing handlers
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700] rev 31957
atexit: test failing handlers
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700 ui: add special-purpose atexit functionality
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:54:12 -0700] rev 31956
ui: add special-purpose atexit functionality In spite of its longstanding use, Python's built-in atexit code is not suitable for Mercurial's purposes, for several reasons: * Handlers run after application code has finished. * Because of this, the code that runs handlers swallows exceptions (since there's no possible stacktrace to associate errors with). If we're lucky, we'll get something spat out to stderr (if stderr still works), which of course isn't any use in a big deployment where it's important that exceptions get logged and aggregated. * Mercurial's current atexit handlers make unfortunate assumptions about process state (specifically stdio) that, coupled with the above problems, make it impossible to deal with certain categories of error (try "hg status > /dev/full" on a Linux box). * In Python 3, the atexit implementation is completely hidden, so we can't hijack the platform's atexit code to run handlers at a time of our choosing. As a result, here's a perfectly cromulent atexit-like implementation over which we have control. This lets us decide exactly when the handlers run (after each request has completed), and control what the process state is when that occurs (and afterwards).
Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:55:18 +0200 context: follow all branches in blockdescendants()
Denis Laxalde <denis@laxalde.org> [Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:55:18 +0200] rev 31955
context: follow all branches in blockdescendants() In the initial implementation of blockdescendants (and thus followlines(..., descend=True) revset), only the first branch encountered in descending direction was followed. Update the algorithm so that all children of a revision ('x' in code) are considered. Accordingly, we need to prevent a child revision to be yielded multiple times when it gets visited through different path, so we skip 'i' when this occurs. Finally, since we now consider all parents of a possible child touching a given line range, we take care of yielding the child if it has a diff in specified line range with at least one of its parent (same logic as blockancestors()).
Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:27:19 -0700 pager: set some environment variables if they're not set
Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:27:19 -0700] rev 31954
pager: set some environment variables if they're not set Git did this already [1] [2]. We want this behavior too [3]. This provides a better default user experience (like, supporting colors) if users have things like "PAGER=less" set, which is not uncommon. The environment variables are provided by a method so extensions can override them on demand. [1]: https://github.com/git/git/blob/6a5ff7acb5965718cc7016c0ab6c601454fd7cde/pager.c#L87 [2]: https://github.com/git/git/blob/6a5ff7acb5965718cc7016c0ab6c601454fd7cde/Makefile#L1545 [3]: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2017-March/094780.html
Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:48:18 -0400 sshpeer: fix docstring typo
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:48:18 -0400] rev 31953
sshpeer: fix docstring typo
Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:12:49 -0400 util: pass sysstrs to warnings.filterwarnings
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:12:49 -0400] rev 31952
util: pass sysstrs to warnings.filterwarnings Un-breaks the Python 3 build.
Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:21:38 +0200 vfs: deprecate all old classes in scmutil
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:21:38 +0200] rev 31951
vfs: deprecate all old classes in scmutil Now that all vfs class moved to the vfs module, we can deprecate the old one.
Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:03:29 +0200 util: add a way to issue deprecation warning without a UI object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:03:29 +0200] rev 31950
util: add a way to issue deprecation warning without a UI object Our current deprecation warning mechanism relies on ui object. They are case where we cannot have access to the UI object. On a general basis we avoid using the python mechanism for deprecation warning because up to Python 2.6 it is exposing warning to unsuspecting user who cannot do anything to deal with them. So we build a "safe" strategy to hide this warnings behind a flag in an environment variable. The test runner set this flag so that tests show these warning. This will help us marker API as deprecated for extensions to update their code.
Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:49:48 +0200 gitweb: plug followlines UI in filerevision view
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:49:48 +0200] rev 31949
gitweb: plug followlines UI in filerevision view Mostly copy CSS rules from style-paper.css into style-gitweb.css. The only modification is addition of !important on "background-color" rule for "pre.sourcelines > span.followlines-selected" selector as the background color is otherwise overriden by "pre.sourcelines.stripes > :nth-child(4n+4)" rule.
Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:04:09 +0200 gitweb: handle "patch" query parameter in filelog view
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:04:09 +0200] rev 31948
gitweb: handle "patch" query parameter in filelog view As for paper style, in f36dc643ffdc, we display "diff" data as an additional row in the table of revision entries for the gitweb template. Also, as these additional diff rows have a white background, they may be confused with log entry rows ("age", "author", "description", "links") of even parity (parity0 also have a white background). So we disable parity colors for log entry rows when diff is displayed and fix the color to the "dark" parity (i.e. parity1 #f6f6f0) so that it's always distinguishable from
Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:59:58 +0200 gitweb: add information about "linerange" filtering in filelog view
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:59:58 +0200] rev 31947
gitweb: add information about "linerange" filtering in filelog view As for paper style, in 5e6d44511317, we display a "(following lines <fromline>:<toline> <a href='...'>back to filelog</a>)" message alongside the file name when "linerange" query parameter is present.
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:16:30 +0200 util: fix human-readable printing of negative byte counts
Gábor Stefanik <gabor.stefanik@nng.com> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:16:30 +0200] rev 31946
util: fix human-readable printing of negative byte counts Apply the same human-readable printing rules to negative byte counts as to positive ones. Fixes output of debugupgraderepo.
Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:17:53 -0700 show: make template option actually show up in help
Ryan McElroy <rmcelroy@fb.com> [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:17:53 -0700] rev 31945
show: make template option actually show up in help Previously, the --template/-T option didn't show up in help because it's marked as experimental. It's not really experimental for show, and its quite important for show's funcationality, so let's make sure it always shows up.
Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:31:15 -0700 show: implement underway view
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:31:15 -0700] rev 31944
show: implement underway view This is the beginning of a wip/smartlog view. It is basically a manually constructed (read: fast) revset function to collect "relevant" changesets combined with a custom template and a graph displayer. It obviously needs a lot of work. I'd like to get *something* usable in 4.2 so `hg show` has some value to end-users. Let the bikeshedding begin.
Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:28:44 -0700 show: fix formatting of multiple commands
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:28:44 -0700] rev 31943
show: fix formatting of multiple commands Because we're formatting to RST, short lines wrap and there needs to be an extra line break between paragraphs to prevent that. In addition, the indentation in the old code was a bit off. Refactor the code to a function (so we don't leak variables outside the module) and modify it so it renders more correctly.
Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:42:20 -0700 pycompat: import correct cookie module on Python 3
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:42:20 -0700] rev 31942
pycompat: import correct cookie module on Python 3 http.cookielib doesn't exist. http.cookiejar does and it contains the symbols we need. This fixes test failures on Python 3.
Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:50:23 -0700 chg: respect environment variables for pager
Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> [Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:50:23 -0700] rev 31941
chg: respect environment variables for pager Previously chg runs the pager command without respecting its environment variables being told to use. This patch makes it so.
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:36:40 +0200 hgweb: add a link to followlines in descending direction
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:36:40 +0200] rev 31940
hgweb: add a link to followlines in descending direction We change the content of the followlines popup to display two links inviting to follow the history of selected lines in ascending (as before) and descending directions. The popup now renders as: follow history of lines <fromline>:<toline>: <a href=...>ascending</a> / <a href=...>descending</a>
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:23:41 +0200 hgweb: handle a "descend" query parameter in filelog command
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:23:41 +0200] rev 31939
hgweb: handle a "descend" query parameter in filelog command When this "descend" query parameter is present along with "linerange" parameter, we get revisions following line range in descending order. The parameter has no effect without "linerange".
Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:24:47 +0100 revset: add a 'descend' argument to followlines to return descendants
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:24:47 +0100] rev 31938
revset: add a 'descend' argument to followlines to return descendants This is useful to follow changes in a block of lines forward in the history (for instance, when one wants to find out how a function evolved from a point in history). We added a 'descend' parameter to followlines(), which defaults to False. If True, followlines() returns descendants of startrev. Because context.blockdescendants() does not follow renames, these are not followed by the revset either, so history will end when a rename occurs (as can be seen in tests).
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:11:36 +0200 context: add a blockdescendants function
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:11:36 +0200] rev 31937
context: add a blockdescendants function This is symmetrical with blockancestors() and yields descendants of a filectx with changes in the given line range. The noticeable difference is that the algorithm does not follow renames (probably because filelog.descendants() does not), so we are missing branches with renames.
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:40:52 -0800 url: support auth.cookiesfile for adding cookies to HTTP requests
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:40:52 -0800] rev 31936
url: support auth.cookiesfile for adding cookies to HTTP requests Mercurial can't currently send cookies as part of HTTP requests. Some authentication systems use cookies. So, it seems like adding support for sending cookies seems like a useful feature. This patch implements support for reading cookies from a file and automatically sending them as part of the request. We rely on the "cookiejar" Python module to do the heavy lifting of parsing cookies files. We currently only support the Mozilla (really Netscape-era) cookie format. There is another format supported by cookielib and we may want to consider using that, especially since the Netscape cookie parser can't parse ports. It wasn't immediately obvious to me what the format of the other parser is, so I didn't know how to test it. I /think/ it might be literal "Cookie" header values, but I'm not sure. If it is more robust than the Netscape format, we may want to just support it.
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:35:10 -0800 httpconnection: allow a global auth.cookiefile config entry
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:35:10 -0800] rev 31935
httpconnection: allow a global auth.cookiefile config entry This foreshadows support for defining a cookies file.
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:35:21 -0800 util: make cookielib module available
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:35:21 -0800] rev 31934
util: make cookielib module available In preparation for supporting sending cookies on HTTP requests.
Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:28:25 +0200 crecord: avoid setting non-existing SIGTSTP signal on windows (issue5512)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:28:25 +0200] rev 31933
crecord: avoid setting non-existing SIGTSTP signal on windows (issue5512) Windows do not have a SIGTSTP so we avoid setting the handler if the signal is unknown.
Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:25:13 +0200 crecord: ensure we reinstall the SIGTSTP handler
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:25:13 +0200] rev 31932
crecord: ensure we reinstall the SIGTSTP handler Previous, exceptions would prevent the reinstallation of the signal.
Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:25:33 +0200 crecord: avoid setting non-existing signal SIGWINCH on windows
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:25:33 +0200] rev 31931
crecord: avoid setting non-existing signal SIGWINCH on windows Windows do not have a SIGWINCH so we avoid setting the handler if the signal is unknown.
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:06:09 +0200 crecord: ensure we reinstall the SIGWINCH handler
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:06:09 +0200] rev 31930
crecord: ensure we reinstall the SIGWINCH handler Previous, exception in _main(...) would prevent the reinstallation of the signal.
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:05:12 +0200 crecord: extract most of 'main' into a sub function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:05:12 +0200] rev 31929
crecord: extract most of 'main' into a sub function There are some setup and cleanup necessary around the main code, that setup/cleanup code needs multiple adjustments so we extract the core code into its own function first for clarity.
Mon, 03 Apr 2017 23:13:49 +0900 templater: add shorthand for building a dict like {"key": key}
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Apr 2017 23:13:49 +0900] rev 31928
templater: add shorthand for building a dict like {"key": key} Like field init shorthand of Rust. This is convenient for building a JSON object from selected keywords. This means dict() won't support Python-like dict(iterable) syntax because it's ambiguous. Perhaps it could be implemented as 'mapdict(xs % (k, v))'.
Sat, 08 Apr 2017 23:33:32 +0900 templater: find keyword name more thoroughly on filtering error
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 08 Apr 2017 23:33:32 +0900] rev 31927
templater: find keyword name more thoroughly on filtering error Before, it could spill an internal representation of compiled template such as [(<function runsymbol at 0x....>, 'extras'), ...]. Show less cryptic message if no symbol found. New findsymbolicname() function will be also used by dict() constructor.
Mon, 03 Apr 2017 22:54:06 +0900 templater: add dict() constructor
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Apr 2017 22:54:06 +0900] rev 31926
templater: add dict() constructor It's troublesome to build JSON by template, so let's add programmatic way.
Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:28:09 +0900 templatekw: add public function to wrap a dict by _hybrid object
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:28:09 +0900] rev 31925
templatekw: add public function to wrap a dict by _hybrid object
Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:25:36 +0900 templatekw: add public function to wrap a list by _hybrid object
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:25:36 +0900] rev 31924
templatekw: add public function to wrap a list by _hybrid object
Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:10:47 +0900 templatekw: add default implementation of _hybrid.gen
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:10:47 +0900] rev 31923
templatekw: add default implementation of _hybrid.gen This is convenient for new template keyword, which doesn't need to support the legacy list hack (provided by _showlist()), but still wants to have a string representation.
Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:58:27 +0900 parser: preserve order of keyword arguments
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:58:27 +0900] rev 31922
parser: preserve order of keyword arguments This helps building dict(key1=value1, ...) in deterministic way.
Mon, 03 Apr 2017 22:07:09 +0900 parser: extend buildargsdict() to support arbitrary number of **kwargs
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 03 Apr 2017 22:07:09 +0900] rev 31921
parser: extend buildargsdict() to support arbitrary number of **kwargs Prepares for adding dict(key1=value1, ...) template function. More tests will be added later.
Sat, 08 Apr 2017 20:07:37 +0900 parser: verify excessive number of args excluding kwargs in buildargsdict()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 08 Apr 2017 20:07:37 +0900] rev 31920
parser: verify excessive number of args excluding kwargs in buildargsdict() This makes the next patch slightly simpler. We don't need to check the excessive number of keyword arguments since unknown and duplicated kwargs are rejected.
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:50:23 +0200 obsolescence: add test case B-7 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:50:23 +0200] rev 31919
obsolescence: add test case B-7 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case B-7: Prune above non-targeted common changeset Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:49:38 +0200 obsolescence: add test case B-6 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:49:38 +0200] rev 31918
obsolescence: add test case B-6 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case B6: Pruned changeset with precursors not in pushed set Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:49:10 +0200 obsolescence: add test case B-5 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:49:10 +0200] rev 31917
obsolescence: add test case B-5 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce B-5: Push of a children of changeset which successors is pruned Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:47:16 +0200 obsolescence: add test case B-4 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:47:16 +0200] rev 31916
obsolescence: add test case B-4 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case B4: Pruned changeset on common part of history Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:46:53 +0200 obsolescence: add test case B-3 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:46:53 +0200] rev 31915
obsolescence: add test case B-3 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case B3: Pruned changeset on non-pushed part of the history Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:46:31 +0200 obsolescence: add test case B-2 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:46:31 +0200] rev 31914
obsolescence: add test case B-2 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case B-2: Prune on targeted common changeset Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:46:03 +0200 obsolescence: add test case B-1 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:46:03 +0200] rev 31913
obsolescence: add test case B-1 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case B-1: Prune on non-targeted common changeset Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:44:39 +0200 obsolescence: add test case A-7 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:44:39 +0200] rev 31912
obsolescence: add test case A-7 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case A-7: non targeted common changeset Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:44:19 +0200 obsolescence: add test case A-6 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:44:19 +0200] rev 31911
obsolescence: add test case A-6 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case A6: new markers between changesets already known on both side Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:43:49 +0200 obsolescence: add test case A-5 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:43:49 +0200] rev 31910
obsolescence: add test case A-5 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case A-5: partial reordering Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:43:26 +0200 obsolescence: add test case A-4 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:43:26 +0200] rev 31909
obsolescence: add test case A-4 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case A-4: Push in the middle of the obsolescence chain Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:42:49 +0200 obsolescence: add test case A-3 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:42:49 +0200] rev 31908
obsolescence: add test case A-3 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case A3: new branchs created, one pushed Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:41:46 +0200 obsolescence: add test case A-2 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:41:46 +0200] rev 31907
obsolescence: add test case A-2 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case A-2: Two heads, only one of them pushed Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:41:21 +0200 obsolescence: add test case A-1 for obsolescence markers exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:41:21 +0200] rev 31906
obsolescence: add test case A-1 for obsolescence markers exchange About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce case A-1: pushing a single head Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:40:40 +0200 obsolescence: add setup script for obsolescence markers exchange tests
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:40:40 +0200] rev 31905
obsolescence: add setup script for obsolescence markers exchange tests About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside. I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue. I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial. They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series. This patch introduce the common script that setup the basic environment for the test cases. Once this script is in. We can accept the other patches in any order. Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file. Here are timing to support this claim. # Multiple test files version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t 53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total 52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total 52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total # Single test file version: # run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t 52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total 52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total 53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:03:11 +0200 upgrade: simplify the "origin" dispatch in dry run
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:03:11 +0200] rev 31904
upgrade: simplify the "origin" dispatch in dry run We could compute the final set we need directly.
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:11:45 +0200 upgrade: use 'improvement' object for action too
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:11:45 +0200] rev 31903
upgrade: use 'improvement' object for action too This simplify multiple pieces of code. For now we restrict this upgrade to the top level function to keep this patch simple.
Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:10:03 +0200 upgrade: implement equality for 'improvement' object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:10:03 +0200] rev 31902
upgrade: implement equality for 'improvement' object Through the code, we use a mix of 'improvement' object and string. Having a single type would be simpler. For this we need the object to be comparable.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -60 +60 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip