Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:13:44 -0500] rev 27382
perf: adjust perfstartup() for Windows
The /dev/null redirect was causing the following error:
The system cannot find the path specified.
Adjusting HGRCPATH as part of the command line causes the system to try to
execute 'HGRCPATH'.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 15:36:20 -0500] rev 27381
test-hgignore: conditionalize an illegal Windows filename
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sat, 12 Dec 2015 21:36:21 -0600] rev 27380
mac: fix percent-encoding of non-utf-8 characters (issue4999)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:19:55 -0800] rev 27379
help: support loading sub-topics
If a sub-topic/section is requested and the main topic corresponds to
a topic with sub-topics, we now look for and return content for a
sub-topic if found.
With this patch, `hg help internals.X` now works. hgweb does not yet
render sub-topics, however.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:29:01 -0800] rev 27378
help: pass sub-topic into help query functions
While we will likely only use this variable in helptopic(), all these
functions are called with the same arguments, so we have to be
consistent.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:04:45 -0800] rev 27377
help: pass subtopic into help()
Now that we have multiple directories where help topics can live,
we need a mechanism to access them. We already use "." to
separate topic from section. So it seems logical to also use "." to
denote the sub-directory of a topic.
This patch teaches the help command to parse out the possible
sub-topic and pass it to the help system.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:35:03 -0800] rev 27376
help: add "internals" topic
We introduce the "internals" help topic, which renders an index of
available sub-topics. The sub-topics themselves are still not
reachable via the help system.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:45:27 -0800] rev 27375
help: teach loaddoc to load from a different directory
The help system currently only supports showing help topics from a
single directory. We'll need to teach it to show results from
different directories in order to show the internals topics.
The first step is to teach loaddoc() to load documentation from
a sub-directory.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:34:04 -0800] rev 27374
setup.py: package internals help files
mpm says internal docs should be visible via `hg help` and hgweb. They
need to be in the distribution for this to work. Package them.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:27:52 -0800] rev 27373
help: add documentation for bundle types
Bundle types and the high-level data format of each bundle isn't
documented anywhere. Let's document this as well.
Obviously there are many more details about bundles that could be
written about. But you have to start somewhere.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 25 Oct 2015 00:19:45 +0100] rev 27372
help: add documentation for changegroup formats
There is no formal location for spec-like technical/internal docs. The
repository makes sense as such a location because spec-like
documentation should be reviewed (ruling out a wiki). mpm has also
stated that he would like this documentation to be part of the
built-in help system. So, we establish an "internals" sub-directory
to hold this class of documentation.
The format of changegroups does not appear to be documented anywhere,
even in source code. It therefore seemed like an appropriate first thing
to document.
This patch adds low-level documentation of versions 1 and 2 of the
changegroup foromat. It currently only describes the raw data format.
There is probably room to write higher-level documentation on strategies
for producing and consuming the data. We'll leave that for another day.
The added file is not yet accessible via `hg help` nor via hgweb.
Support for this will follow in subsequent patches.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 06 Dec 2015 19:04:10 -0800] rev 27371
util: reimplement lrucachedict
As part of attempting to more aggressively use the existing
lrucachedict, collections.deque operations were frequently
showing up in profiling output, negating benefits of caching.
Searching the internet seems to tell me that the most efficient
way to implement an LRU cache in Python is to have a dict indexing
the cached entries and then to use a doubly linked list to track
freshness of each entry. So, this patch replaces our existing
lrucachedict with a version using such a pattern.
The recently introduced perflrucachedict command reveals the
following timings for 10,000 operations for the following cache
sizes for the existing cache:
n=4 init=0.004079 gets=0.003632 sets=0.005188 mixed=0.005402
n=8 init=0.004045 gets=0.003998 sets=0.005064 mixed=0.005328
n=16 init=0.004011 gets=0.004496 sets=0.005021 mixed=0.005555
n=32 init=0.004064 gets=0.005611 sets=0.005188 mixed=0.006189
n=64 init=0.003975 gets=0.007684 sets=0.005178 mixed=0.007245
n=128 init=0.004121 gets=0.012005 sets=0.005422 mixed=0.009471
n=256 init=0.004143 gets=0.020295 sets=0.005227 mixed=0.013612
n=512 init=0.004039 gets=0.036703 sets=0.005243 mixed=0.020685
n=1024 init=0.004193 gets=0.068142 sets=0.005251 mixed=0.033064
n=2048 init=0.004070 gets=0.133383 sets=0.005160 mixed=0.050359
n=4096 init=0.004053 gets=0.265194 sets=0.004868 mixed=0.048352
n=8192 init=0.004087 gets=0.542218 sets=0.004562 mixed=0.032753
n=16384 init=0.004106 gets=1.064055 sets=0.004179 mixed=0.020367
n=32768 init=0.004034 gets=2.097620 sets=0.004260 mixed=0.013031
n=65536 init=0.004108 gets=4.106390 sets=0.004268 mixed=0.010191
As the data shows, the existing cache's retrieval performance
diminishes linearly with cache size. (Keep in mind the microbenchmark
is testing 100% cache hit rate.)
The new cache implementation reveals the following:
n=4 init=0.006665 gets=0.006541 sets=0.005733 mixed=0.006876
n=8 init=0.006649 gets=0.006374 sets=0.005663 mixed=0.006899
n=16 init=0.006570 gets=0.006504 sets=0.005799 mixed=0.007057
n=32 init=0.006854 gets=0.006459 sets=0.005747 mixed=0.007034
n=64 init=0.006580 gets=0.006495 sets=0.005740 mixed=0.006992
n=128 init=0.006534 gets=0.006739 sets=0.005648 mixed=0.007124
n=256 init=0.006669 gets=0.006773 sets=0.005824 mixed=0.007151
n=512 init=0.006701 gets=0.007061 sets=0.006042 mixed=0.007372
n=1024 init=0.006641 gets=0.007620 sets=0.006387 mixed=0.007464
n=2048 init=0.006517 gets=0.008598 sets=0.006871 mixed=0.008077
n=4096 init=0.006720 gets=0.010933 sets=0.007854 mixed=0.008663
n=8192 init=0.007383 gets=0.015969 sets=0.010288 mixed=0.008896
n=16384 init=0.006660 gets=0.025447 sets=0.011208 mixed=0.008826
n=32768 init=0.006658 gets=0.044390 sets=0.011192 mixed=0.008943
n=65536 init=0.006836 gets=0.082736 sets=0.011151 mixed=0.008826
Let's go through the results.
The new cache takes longer to construct. ~6.6ms vs ~4.1ms. However,
this is measuring 10,000 __init__ calls, so the difference is
~0.2us/instance. We currently only create lrucachedict for manifest
instances, so this regression is not likely relevant.
The new cache is slightly slower for retrievals for cache sizes
< 1024. It's worth noting that the only existing use of lurcachedict
is in manifest.py and the default cache size is 4. This regression
is worrisome. However, for n=4, the delta is ~2.9s for 10,000 lookups,
or ~0.29us/op. Again, this is a marginal regression and likely not
relevant in the real world. Timing `hg log -p -l 100` for
mozilla-central reveals that cache lookup times are dominated by
decompression and fulltext resolution (even with lz4 manifests).
The new cache is significantly faster for retrievals at larger
capacities. Whereas the old implementation has retrieval performance
linear with cache capacity, the new cache is constant time until much
larger values. And, when it does start to increase significantly, it
is a few magnitudes faster than the current cache.
The new cache does appear to be slower for sets when capacity is large.
However, performance is similar for smaller capacities. Of course,
caches should generally be optimized for retrieval performance because
if a cache is getting more sets than gets, it doesn't really make
sense to cache. If this regression is worrisome, again, taking the
largest regression at n=65536 of ~6.9ms for 10,000 results in a
regression of ~0.68us/op. This is not significant in the grand scheme
of things.
Overall, the new cache is performant at retrievals at much larger
capacity values which makes it a generally more useful cache backend.
While there are regressions, their absolute value is extremely small.
Since we aren't using lrucachedict aggressively today, these
regressions should not be relevant. The improved scalability of
lrucachedict should enable us to more aggressively utilize
lrucachedict for more granular caching (read: higher capacity caches)
in the near future. The impetus for this patch is to establish a cache
of decompressed revlog revisions, notably manifest revisions. And since
delta chains can grow to >10,000 and cache hit rate can be high, the
improved retrieval performance of lrucachedict should be relevant.