largefiles: remove the `changing_parents` context in `openlfdirstate` This code might run in any kind of change context, we should rely on the higher level context instead of opening our own.

largefiles: remove the second `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles` Now that the `update_file` call have been migrated, we can drop the semantically-wrong `changing_parents` context.

largefiles: remove the first `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles` Now that the `update_file` call have been migrated, we can drop the semantically-wrong `changing_parents` context.

largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `updatelfiles` This is what the function is meant for.

largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `synclfdirstate` This is what the function is meant for.

largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `openlfdirstate` This is what the function is meant for.

win32text: make the hacky call cover more cases Now that I understand what this is doing, It seems like the case for `p1_tracked` were covered by neither the code nor the test. Now the code cover it at least.

win32text: drop the `changing_parents` context in revert upgrade We are not changing parents here, so let us not pretend we do.

win32text: clean up and clarify the post-revert hack of dirstate The change is unrelated to changing parents and should not be a in a "changing_parents" context. This call is quite hacky, but now it is at least explicitly hacky. We will drop the `changing_parents` context in the next changesets, but we kept this change simple to help readability.

dirstate: introduce a `hacky_extension_update_file` method See inline documentation for details.

mq: properly take the wlock during the full qfold operation Otherwise the operation could be raced… for unknown result.

locking: hold the wlock for the full duration of the "keyword demo" The risk of racing the demo is low, since it seems to create its own repository on the fly. However it is clearer and more consistent.

locking: grab the wlock before touching the dirstate in `perfdirstatewrite` If we touch the dirstate, we should hold the `wlock`.

locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg addremove` duration Otherwise, there is a race condition window between the time we resolve the file to addremove with the matcher and the time we lock the repo and modify the dirstate. For example, the working copy might have been updated away, or purged, and the matched files would no longer be correct.

locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg forget` duration Otherwise, there is a race condition window between the time we resolve the file to forget with the matcher and the time we lock the repo and modify the dirstate. For example, the working copy might have been updated away, or purged, and the matched files would no longer be correct.

locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg remove` duration Otherwise, there is a race condition window between the time we resolve the file to remove with the matcher and the time we lock the repo and modify the dirstate. For example, the working copy might have been updated away, or purged, and the matched files would no longer be correct.

locking: take the `wlock` for the full `hg add` duration Otherwise, there is a race condition window between the time we resolve the file to add with the matcher and the time we lock the repo and modify the dirstate. For example, the working copy might have been updated away, or purged, and the matched files would no longer be correct.

dirstate: drop some very fishy looking piece of code This piece of code is marking the **real** dirstate file as a temporary transaction file. This means it get deleted on transaction rollback. This this quite wrong, especially as the comment points out some `dirstate.pending` motivation and the `.pending` file should already be fully managed by the transaction. The only ready I can think of this behavior not having awful results right now is because other transaction logic restore backed up content above the one that got wrongfully deleted. Let us stop doing this anyway, All tests seems happy.

dirstate: do not write an empty dirstate just for backup This will get in the way when we get more strict about holding the lock when writing the dirstate. Instead, we simply don't copy dirstate files around if there are None at backup time. A couple of tests are impacted they no longer need to backup such "empty" dirstate.

dirstate: pre-indent some of the backup code This will make the next changeset clearer.

debugrebuilddirstate: double check that no transaction is open Since transaction impact dirstate write, we make sure nobody is trying anything strange with this internal command.

dirstate: explicitly write the dirstate after `debugrebuilddirstate` I am working on making the dirstate write patterns more predictable. This patch is part of a small series of similar patches that adds a explicit dirstate write in a handful of location where the dirstate is updated "a bit in a strange way". With this explicit write, we are no longer relying on implicite write of the dirstate on `wlock` release. This make the world a better place.

dirstate: explicitly write the dirstate after `keyword` "overwrite" I am working on making the dirstate write patterns more predictable. This patch is part of a small series of similar patches that adds a explicit dirstate write in a handful of location where the dirstate is updated "a bit in a strange way". With this explicit write, we are no longer relying on implicite write of the dirstate on `wlock` release. This make the world a better place.

dirstate: explicitly write the dirstate after `eol` dirstate manipulation I am working on making the dirstate write patterns more predictable. This patch is part of a small series of similar patches that adds a explicit dirstate write in a handful of location where the dirstate is updated "a bit in a strange way". With this explicit write, we are no longer relying on implicite write of the dirstate on `wlock` release. This make the world a better place.

dirstate: explicitly write the dirstate after mq dirstate rebuild I am working on making the dirstate write patterns more predictable. This patch is part of a small series of similar patches that adds a explicit dirstate write in a handful of location where the dirstate is updated "a bit in a strange way". With this explicit write, we are no longer relying on implicite write of the dirstate on `wlock` release. This make the world a better place.

transaction: quietly rollback if no other changes than temporary files If no actual change have been made, we don't really need to roll them back. We only have to cleanup some temporary files and it seems reasonable to do that quietly. This will help us to use the transaction in wider context¹ without impacting the user experience. [1] as in Python context managers that lives longer.

transaction: run abort callback in all cases Previously, these possibly important callback were "forgotten" when running a quick rollback. This is now fixed, as the tests shown.

transaction: clarify the "quick abort" scenario Right now, the transaction has a code-pass to do a "quick abort" that skip most¹ (too much) of the logic when the right condition are detected² We are about to improve this logic in multiple aspect. We clarify the code first. The conditional return in `_can_quick_abort` looks a bit weird because we are about to make them more complex very soon. [1] actually too much [2] actually not often enough