Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:31:34 -0700] rev 45858
errors: set detailed exit code to 100 for some remote errors
This is per https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ErrorCategoriesPlan.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9309
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:56:52 -0800] rev 45857
errors: catch urllib errors specifically instead of using safehasattr()
Before this patch, we would catch `IOError` and `OSError` and check if
the instance had a `.code` member (indicates `HTTPError`) or a
`.reason` member (indicates the more generic `URLError`). It seems to
me that can simply catch those exception specifically instead, so
that's what this code does. The existing code is from fbe8834923c5
(commands: report http exceptions nicely, 2005-06-17), so I suspect
it's just that there was no `urllib2` (where `URLError` lives) back
then.
The old code mentioned `SSLError` in a comment. The new code does
*not* try to catch that. The documentation for `ssl.SSLError` says
that it has a `.reason` property, but `python -c 'import ssl;
print(dir(ssl.SSLError("foo", Exception("bar"))))` doesn't mention
that property on either Python 2 or Python 3 on my system. It also
seems that `sslutil` is pretty careful about converting `ssl.SSLError`
to `error.Abort`. It also is carefult to not assume that instances of
the exception have a `.reason`. So I at least don't want to catch
`ssl.SSLError` and handle it the same way as `URLError` because that
would likely result in a crash. I also wonder if we don't need to
handle it at all (because `sslutil` might handle all the cases). It's
now early in the release cycle, so perhaps we can just see how it
goes?
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9318
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:29:55 -0800] rev 45856
errors: raise InputError in fancyopts
If a value of wrong type is passed to a command line flag, that's
cleary an InputError.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9308
Mathias De Mare <mathias.de_mare@nokia.com> [Fri, 06 Nov 2020 17:32:23 +0100] rev 45855
packaging: switch centos 7 packaging to python 3
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9293
Mathias De Mare <mathias.de_mare@nokia.com> [Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:24:54 +0100] rev 45854
packaging: remove centos5 and centos6 support
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9292
Mathias De Mare <mathias.de_mare@nokia.com> [Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:01:45 +0100] rev 45853
test-filecache: use sys.executable to call python
As was mentioned in c102b704edb5, test scripts calling 'python' or 'python3'
might use the wrong python.
For test-filecache.py, this causes a failed test on CentOS 7.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9295
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:03:47 -0400] rev 45852
make: add a pyoxidizer target
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9291
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:44:15 -0500] rev 45851
pyoxidizer: switch to modern config using run_command instead of run_mode
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9290
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:25:33 -0500] rev 45850
pyoxidizer: default to one-file binary on non-Windows platforms
Windows has some extra constraints that require a multi-file install,
but we expect folks to use an MSI or similar installer there so it's
less of a big deal.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9289
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 06 Nov 2020 13:58:59 -0800] rev 45849
global: use python3 in shebangs
Python 3 is the future. We want Python scripts to be using Python 3
by default.
This change updates all `#!/usr/bin/env python` shebangs to use
`python3`.
Does this mean all scripts use or require Python 3: no.
In the test environment, the `PATH` environment variable in tests is
updated to guarantee that the Python executable used to run
run-tests.py is used. Since test scripts all now use
`#!/usr/bin/env python3`, we had to update this code to install
a `python3` symlink instead of `python`.
It is possible there are some random scripts now executed with the
incorrect Python interpreter in some contexts. However, I would argue
that this was a pre-existing bug: we should almost always be executing
new Python processes using the `sys.executable` from the originating
Python script, as `python` or `python3` won't guarantee we'll use the
same interpreter.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9273