Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:18:40 -0700 bookmarks: factor out adding a list of bookmarks logic from commands
Sean Farley <sean@farley.io> [Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:18:40 -0700] rev 33023
bookmarks: factor out adding a list of bookmarks logic from commands We keep the lock in the caller so that future devs are aware of the locking implications.
Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:10:22 -0700 bookmarks: factor out rename logic from commands
Sean Farley <sean@farley.io> [Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:10:22 -0700] rev 33022
bookmarks: factor out rename logic from commands We keep the lock in the caller so that future devs are aware of the locking implications.
Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:02:48 -0700 bookmarks: factor out delete logic from commands
Sean Farley <sean@farley.io> [Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:02:48 -0700] rev 33021
bookmarks: factor out delete logic from commands We keep the lock in the caller so that future devs are aware of the locking implications.
Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:30:27 -0400 merge with stable
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:30:27 -0400] rev 33020
merge with stable
Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:40:58 +0900 revset: add startdepth limit to ancestors() as internal option
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:40:58 +0900] rev 33019
revset: add startdepth limit to ancestors() as internal option This is necessary to implement the set{gen} (set subscript) operator. For example, set{-n} will be translated to ancestors(set, depth=n, startdepth=n). https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/RevsetOperatorPlan#ideas_from_mpm The UI is undecided and I doubt if the startdepth option would be actually useful, so the option is hidden for now. 'depth' could be extended to take min:max range, in which case, integer depth should select a single generation. ancestors(set, depth=:y) # scan up to y-th generation ancestors(set, depth=x:) # skip until (x-1)-th generation ancestors(set, depth=x) # select only x-th generation Any ideas are welcomed. # reverse(ancestors(tip)) using hg repo 3) 0.075951 4) 0.076175
Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:22:41 +0900 revset: add depth limit to ancestors()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:22:41 +0900] rev 33018
revset: add depth limit to ancestors() This is proposed by the issue5374, and will be a building block of set{gen} (set subscript) operator. https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/RevsetOperatorPlan#ideas_from_mpm # reverse(ancestors(tip)) using hg repo 2) 0.075408 3) 0.075951
Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:11:48 +0900 dagop: compute depth in revancestors() generator
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 00:11:48 +0900] rev 33017
dagop: compute depth in revancestors() generator Surprisingly, this makes revset benchmark slightly faster. I don't know why, but it appears that wrapping -inputrev by tuple is the key. So I decided to just enable depth computation by default. # reverse(ancestors(tip)) using hg repo 1) 0.081051 2) 0.075408
Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:59:09 +0900 dagop: just compare with the last value to deduplicate input of revancestors()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:59:09 +0900] rev 33016
dagop: just compare with the last value to deduplicate input of revancestors() Since we're using a max heap, the current rev should be a duplicate only if it equals to the previous one. We don't have to maintain the whole seen set. # reverse(ancestors(tip)) using hg repo 0) 0.086420 1) 0.081051
Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:22:57 +0900 dagop: bulk rename variables in revancestors() generator
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:22:57 +0900] rev 33015
dagop: bulk rename variables in revancestors() generator - h -> pendingheap: "h" seems too short for variable of long lifetime - current -> currev: future patches will add current "depth" variable - parent -> prev or pctx: short lifetime, follows common naming rules
Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:16:02 +0900 dagop: comment why revancestors() doesn't heapify input revs at once
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:16:02 +0900] rev 33014
dagop: comment why revancestors() doesn't heapify input revs at once I wondered why we're doing this complicated stuff without noticing the input revs may be iterated lazily in descending order. c1f666e27345 showed why.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip