Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:10:43 +0200 unionrepo: drop `baserevdiff`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:10:43 +0200] rev 42838
unionrepo: drop `baserevdiff` It has no caller anymore.
Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:10:00 +0200 unionrepo: use normal inheritance scheme to call revdiff
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:10:00 +0200] rev 42837
unionrepo: use normal inheritance scheme to call revdiff
Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:08:35 +0200 unionrepo: fix `revdiff` implementation to use `rawdata`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:08:35 +0200] rev 42836
unionrepo: fix `revdiff` implementation to use `rawdata` The parent code is using rawdata so we should use it here. Before this change, union repo was probably broken with some flag processors.
Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:05:24 +0200 unionrepo: get rid of `baserevision`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:05:24 +0200] rev 42835
unionrepo: get rid of `baserevision` The method is not called anywhere anymore, so we can safely drop it. Some of the comment get moved to `baserevdiff` because we did not got rid of it (yet).
Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:45:38 +0200 unionrepo: use a lower level overide in unionrepo too
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:45:38 +0200] rev 42834
unionrepo: use a lower level overide in unionrepo too The unionrepo class also have a strange `baserevision` hack, let's try to get ride of it too.
Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:12:16 +0200 bundlerepo: drop the custom `rawdata` implementation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:12:16 +0200] rev 42833
bundlerepo: drop the custom `rawdata` implementation We can rely on the main one now.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip