revlog-split: make sure the self._indexfile attribut is reset (issue6811) Before this change, after a transaction committing a file split, a revlog object would have its `self._indexfile` attribute desynchronised from the actual file storing the data. If that same object is reused (as we do for the manifest during clone bundles), this lead to the data being writting in the wrong location and the repository to go corrupt. We not properly reset the attribut when applicable and everything is back in working order.

revlog-split: also check a case where bundle contains multiple changegroup This case is not affected, we remains in the same transaction. However it seems important to improve the test coverage around these "features". It also helped to assert the scop of the critical bug.

revlog-split: show manifest data loss situation when using clonebundle After the commit of the transaction from applying the clone bundle, changes to the manifest from the subsequent pull would write index data in the wrong file. This lead to data being "lost" after the pull and the repository to be corrupted. We add a test checking this specific scenario. In practice, the issue only affects the manifest but we also test the issue with a file for future proofing things up. See test documentation and failure for details.

Added signature for changeset 83ea6ce48b4f

Added tag 6.4.1 for changeset 83ea6ce48b4f

relnotes: add 6.4.1

sslutil: set context security level for legacy tls testing (issue6760) Current versions of OpenSSL do not allow the use of TLS <1.2 when the library's security level is >=1 (1 being the default on most distributions). Setting the security level in addition to the minimum protocol is therefore necessary for the legacy protocol tests. This is done here ONLY when testing, when: - explicitly setting the cipher string, or - using the "--insecure" flag, or - using the "devel.serverexactprotocol" testing option. See: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/NEWS.md#major-changes-between-openssl-30-and-openssl-310-14-mar-2023

configitems: make devel.serverexactprotocol look dangerous Because it is.

rebase: do not cleanup the working copy when --dry-run is used (issue6802) Since we did not touch the working copy, we don't need to clean it up. This will avoid wiping exiting changes out.

rebase: add a test showing that --dry-run wipes working copy changes Eating people's data on --dry-run seems like a bad idea.